it's been reported on by all the beat reporters and nat'l reporters. It's a story whether you like it or not.
lol - you realize why they've all reported it too, right? Because Cimini made it a story. I'm starting to wonder ... are you actually Cimini?
if they did it b/c of cimini then he did a great job. These was from 2010 after he signed the new deal: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/09/12/jets-floored-by-revis-comments-on-his-contract/ Any halfway decent writer would have brought this up during this offseason.
So does that mean you are Cimini? Again, asking the question originally was no big deal. Repeatedly asking the question and reporting a non-answer as a threat is not good reporting. If there were real news to report we would have heard from a good reporter that the Revis camp was looking for a new deal. We haven't because they aren't. C'mon Rich.
yes I am Cimini. The man is just doing his job, he asked the question and revis refused to say what his intentions were so it will keep being asked. Didn't Mort just report the other day he thought revis would not show up? or is he not credible either? who are the credible guys? those that say positive things about the Jets?