Sanchez contract restructured, according to NYJetsCap

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by BadgerOnLSD, Dec 15, 2011.

  1. ScotsJet

    ScotsJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2004
    Messages:
    7,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    He's saying we can spend $18m more than we spent this year, not $18m more than next year's cap.
     
  2. NotSatoshiNakamoto

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,349
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    I guess that makes sense, but it's a very odd way of putting things. Really all the new rule means is that the unused cap space is rolled forward. The cap will probably be more next year anyway with the new TV contracts so how much more we can spend will also be impacted by that.

    $9 million is $9 million whether you spend it this year or next year.
     
  3. ukilledkenny

    ukilledkenny You bastards!

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,343
    Likes Received:
    0
    It would make more sense if the jets were on the hook for the same amount of salary going into next year but that isn't that case.
     
  4. NYDeadEye

    NYDeadEye Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2011
    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    1
    Where are all these people getting that 500+k figure, I thought all the details weren't out??
     
  5. ukilledkenny

    ukilledkenny You bastards!

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    8,343
    Likes Received:
    0
    The guy from nyjetscap said that's what it is. He is pretty good at getting the legit info.
     
  6. NotSatoshiNakamoto

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,349
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    It's the 7th post.
     
  7. NYDeadEye

    NYDeadEye Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2011
    Messages:
    578
    Likes Received:
    1
    Thought that was pure speculation.

    What the fuck is the point in that?
     
  8. NotSatoshiNakamoto

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    16,349
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    It's a financial landing strip for Peyton Manning.
     
  9. Burnz

    Burnz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    2,539
    Likes Received:
    614
    This whole Manning Crap is so Overblown as long as Rex is our HC there will be no manning under center... Period
     
  10. Footballgod214

    Footballgod214 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    15,298
    Likes Received:
    6,140
    which manning would you prefer at this point?
     
  11. BleednGreen

    BleednGreen Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    8
    Good, a precursor to the move we all know we need. He needs to be cut.

    This bum isn't even as good as Aaron Rodgers yet.
     
  12. Royce Parker

    Royce Parker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,916
    Likes Received:
    61
    I reeeeally hope that was a bad attempt at sarcasm...
     
  13. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    53,295
    Likes Received:
    25,463
    If Sanchez hadn't taken some huge steps forward this year, I would think Manning was possible. But the season isn't over and we have much bigger needs that QB for a change.
     
  14. jonnyd

    jonnyd 2007 TGG.com Funniest Poster Award Winner

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Messages:
    13,035
    Likes Received:
    2,585
    I htink he did say that his numbers werent accounting for salary increses or current roster etc...
     
  15. All Gas No Shake

    All Gas No Shake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Messages:
    2,367
    Likes Received:
    1,044
    i believe the salary cap starts directly tying to the tv contracts in 2013 ... i dont think the cap will increase much next year, if at all
     
  16. Mason

    Mason New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2010
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    0
    You're right, Santonio is self explanatory - A #2 receiver without elite speed and who doesn't get open nearly enough. He's supposed to be our #1 guy.

    Plax is our #2 receiver, but he's just a possession guy/red zone threat.

    Those are our receivers. Just painfully average. You have two guys who only get open half the time. But you also have a Coordinator who doesn't maximize the talents of our receivers, so it looks even worse. It's an receiver corp that's almost complete, it's just missing that true #1 guy that makes everything else fall in line.
     
    #56 Mason, Dec 16, 2011
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2011
  17. Harpua

    Harpua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    8,791
    Likes Received:
    2,311
    I can't help but stop laughing at this. Sounds like your more than a bit bitter about your name sake gettign dumped twice this season because that write up on Holmes is just silly.
     
  18. ConcordeChops

    ConcordeChops 2018 International Poster Award Winner

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    7,045
    Likes Received:
    5,508
    Idiots. Everyone knows Peyton is joining for vet min. The 525k is for another shot at Aso.
     
  19. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    People overrate just how good Holmes is (though a good chunk of his lack of production is on Sanchez and the scheme), but Holmes is a fantastic route runner. Nobody else on our team is that threatening, except for Plaxico in the red-zone.
     
  20. Jets n Boys

    Jets n Boys Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    0
    If we are $9 mil below the cap this year, assuming all contracts remain at the same cap charge, we would have $18 mil to spend next year. I gave a simple example of 100 mil cap. We are at 91 mil. Again, assuming all cap charges for all players remain constant, we'll be 91 mil next year as well, while our salary cap would be $109 mil. $9mil saved this year turns in to $18 next year.

    Now of course cap charges increase and occasionally decrease for players, and I believe that entire $18 mil of cap space would be gone by all the heavy increases in Santonio, Cro, and most other major players contracts.

    This salary charge increase question on major players came up earlier in the season as well. Somebody mentioned that we have just $9 mil of space but we have increases of almost $20mil on about 6 players cap charge for the next year. That's where the $18 mil gets used up, while we restructure some deal. That is why Sanchez' $500k for 2011 salary was moved to 2013, and not 2012. Moving it to 2012 made zero sense since we would still have to count that half a mil.

    Tanny is preparing for 2012 off season already as he knows that he'd have some tough decisions to make in the upcoming season. I doubt if we see a blockbuster deal for us. We might pick a couple of decent players, but forget about a huge pick up in 2012, not until Pace and Scott's contracts are off the books.
     

Share This Page