I have no problem calling the o predictable and all that. I just think it's kinda crazy we are using David mother f'n Clowney to legitimize it.
As I said before, I know what you're trying to say. This argument has been made well before Clowney opened his mouth. If you want to play "consider the source" then consider Clowney the last guy to know. Probably wasn't worthy of its own thread and by no means the ultimate proof but still a telling observation.