Yes, obviously. After the first 3 games so far this season, is there any reason to believe he will be any more or less successful Sunday than he has been in the past? I don't think so, which is why I think the Jets will need to beat us on the ground.
Not enough to say anything for certain. Jets fans would know better than I do where he is along in his progression
Those stats are very misleading, it annoys me as much as the "When Team X runs the ball a lot they win" stat. Obviously you pass when you are behind in games, and run when you are ahead, so it only makes sense that big passing numbers has more losses than big run numbers.
did you recently check out that tall wr stats vs short db stat? thing is spot on. in all seriousness sanchez should be able to shit on this secondary, if he stays away from ed reed.
bhahaha....if we can destroy Roethlisberger and Bradford, I think Sanchez will offer little resistance. Or do you mean he'll shit on us like he did last year for 74 yards??
Mark Sanchez > Sam Bradford Yes, Sunday Night's game will be a carbon copy of last year's game, because that is exactly how the NFL works.
Maybe in the past that was true. Not in today's NFL. Another way to look at it is that Sanchez/passing offense was one of the reasons you were likely behind in those games in the first place.
shit seriously? i would of never figured that with a young quarterback. i guess he will stay the same forever.
No, because he never had Flacco's defensive backing. He also walked into Tom Brady's dynasty 3 times. And Flacco does not command an offense like Manning. Horrible comparison with a transparent angle that was easy to discredit.
He had a QB rating of 56 If only he had a QB rating of 62 like the great "Flacco" did in the same game.
you serious? so did you expect to beat ben roethlisberger a few weeks ago? because you havent in a long time. how did ben do last time ya guys met? did you mark it as an L right away before the game?
