Wilkerson...a great fit

Discussion in 'Draft' started by WW85, Apr 29, 2011.

  1. WW85

    WW85 MOCKERATOR
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    13,483
    Likes Received:
    959
    The Jets got the BPA to fill a need drafting Wilkerson.

    IMO, it was a slim chance Mo would fall to #30. I projected Wilkerson to go
    anywhere from #18 to #26. The fall of Cameron Jordan helped the Jets, since the Saints would have taken Wilkerson if Jordan wasn't available.

    Wilkerson is very versatile, a big plus in Rex's system. Wilk can play inside in 4 man fronts and outside in 3 man fronts. Wilkerson is just as productive stopping the run and rushing the passer. A huge wing span that can knock down passes and knock the ball out of the QB's hands.

    Wilkerson loves football and if you watch film he is very enthusiastic and a team player. My slight concern is the competition he faced, but it should be noted he played a great game against Penn St.

    Smart pick by Tanny....Rex's DNA is all over this player. Wilk reminds me of Ty Warren, a player that played well inside and out.


    It's been a long time since the Jets addressed the D-line high in the draft.

    When is the last time Mel Kiper raved about a player the Jets selected?? Kiper said it was one of the best picks in Rd 1.
     
  2. bojanglesman

    bojanglesman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2009
    Messages:
    6,123
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm ashamed I focused on the one unintentionally pervy statement. I couldn't resist.

    I think it was a great pick. 2 years in a row we get a guy that shouldn't have been there when we picked.
     
  3. Snatch Catch

    Snatch Catch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,089
    Likes Received:
    2,556
    I posted this in the main forum, but it sort of fits here, too. It appears that almost every media talent evaluator is unanimous in saying that Wilkerson has a huge ceiling and is incredible value at the 30th pick of the 1st round.

    Here's what Kiper wrote in his final mock the day before the draft when he had Wilkerson going 17th overall to the Pats:


    Here's McShay, who had him going 18th overall to the Chargers in his final mock of 4/20:


    McShay again in his second to last mock (4/6) he had Wilkerson going 11th overall to the Texans:


    Mayock, from Path To The Draft in late March:

    And more from NFL.com:

     
  4. joeklecko

    joeklecko New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    1,465
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nah, you're off by at least two feet.
     
  5. CodeGreen

    CodeGreen Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2010
    Messages:
    1,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good take WW

    IMO, I've said it a few other places but Wilk is going to be even more appreciated once he starts playing.
     
  6. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    Last season with Wilson? Everyone loved that pick, called it the steal of round 1 because he almost went to Cleveland in the top 10.

    That said, I agree with everything you said, love the pick, BPA meets need to a tee.
     
  7. Snatch Catch

    Snatch Catch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,089
    Likes Received:
    2,556
    When was the last time the Jets had an elite DL prospect with a ceiling as high as this? Abraham? I don't remember Robertson as having the same type of ceiling that we read about with Wilkerson, but I could be wrong.
     
  8. ........

    ........ Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Excellent post, and I agree completely. On the other side of this, I wonder what would have happened if the Saints thought Wilk was a better fit for them than Jordan. I'm guessing the Pats never would have traded out of the round and we'd have been choosing between Ayers and Heyward. We made out VERY well.

    For the second year in a row, I'm glad I said our pick wouldn't be available. Seems to work like a charm.
     
  9. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    Love this part, they were my exact thoughts when he was drafted. His versatility is key.


    I love finally having a young, elite talent on the D-Line.
     
  10. GQMartin

    GQMartin Go 'Cuse

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    12,667
    Likes Received:
    5,308
    If the Jets take Heyward do the Steelers take Wilkerson? Or do they go Reed?
     
  11. Mambo9

    Mambo9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    8,906
    Likes Received:
    41
    In terms of versatility and ceiling he really is what our DL needed... now fingers crossed the coaches get the most out of him. Tons of confidence in Rex... it'll be interesting to see our DL coach (former DB and DB coach Carrier) work with someone at a position he (the coach) has never played.
     
  12. JohnnyThaJet

    JohnnyThaJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Messages:
    6,282
    Likes Received:
    1
    Wilkerson, theyd have more time to groom Wilk as well with Ziggy Hood and Aaron Smith on the team but Heyward is solid for them, he'll replace Smith.
     
  13. Mambo9

    Mambo9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    8,906
    Likes Received:
    41
    If we re-sign Ellis Wilkerson doesn't have to an every down player for us in 2011.

    Wouldn't mind seeing Wilkerson in on 1st and 2nd and Ellis in on 3rd at least in the beginning.
     
  14. Nesquik

    Nesquik Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Messages:
    2,653
    Likes Received:
    398
    Wilkerson will soon be a great player in this D, i dont see bust on him, i was praying for Cam Jordan to fall to us but Wilkerson was my second chose as far as 3-4 ends.
     
  15. bigcotch

    bigcotch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2010
    Messages:
    526
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why does it matter? Do you need reassurance that we made a good pick? I don't give a shit if the Steelers picked Heyward quickly or not, Wilkerson is the better player, and better fit for our Defense.

    I'll put our GM, Coach, Scouts up against anyone in the NFL without question.
     
  16. kbgreen

    kbgreen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,659
    Likes Received:
    32
    I don't know but Pitt had their pick in really fast after we took Wilk. They had several minutes left on the clock. My guess is Heyward was their guy all along.
     
  17. Mambo9

    Mambo9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    8,906
    Likes Received:
    41
    Heyward said he wanted to be a Steeler and he was the BPA at a position of need...
     
  18. IIMeanDeanII

    IIMeanDeanII Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    6,727
    Likes Received:
    7,271
    Both teams got really good players. I would have been happy with either player. Heyward or MoWilkerson. It worked out good. This draft has been sweet so far, I can't wait for later today! :)
     
  19. GQMartin

    GQMartin Go 'Cuse

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    12,667
    Likes Received:
    5,308
    Angry much? You read way too into that bro.


    My question was just out of curiousity. I know it was a good pick, I've wanted a NT for 2 drafts now.
     
  20. Yisman

    Yisman Newbie
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    29,723
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    If you're talking about the draft experts, they were definitely a lot higher last year with the Wilson pick.
     

Share This Page