Cimini thinks a trade-up for Kerrigan

Discussion in 'Draft' started by gsulli5861, Apr 1, 2011.

  1. gsulli5861

    gsulli5861 New Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    0
    During his chat today mentioned the Jets really like Ryan Kerrigan. They would likely need to get to around 15. To do that it will cost #30 and likely next year's #1. Thoughts?
     
  2. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wouldn't make that trade.
     
  3. LoyalJetsFan

    LoyalJetsFan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2004
    Messages:
    3,566
    Likes Received:
    0
    I stopped reading after the first 2 words in the thread title
     
  4. Mambo9

    Mambo9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    8,906
    Likes Received:
    41
    We would NEVER make a trade like that!!! nobody would...
     
  5. MBGreen

    MBGreen Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'd light houses on fire if Tanny did that.
     
  6. JfaulkNYJ

    JfaulkNYJ New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2009
    Messages:
    6,967
    Likes Received:
    0
    i saw the chat. this is exactly what was said...


    PIN (Mt. Olive NJ)


    Rich Cimini
    (2:50 PM)


    lol
     
  7. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    ^ If Cimini were writing an article on that would it be titled "Cimini guarantees Jets-Kerrigan trade up" ?
     
  8. Tballlz63

    Tballlz63 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    880
    Likes Received:
    34
    here's a question for all you draft guru's. Are the 1st round 3-4 end prospects (Kerrigan, Heyward, ect...)that much of an upgrade over an undrafted guy like devito? If not, why draft any 3-4 ends early in the draft when we need help in soo many other areas on d.

    I know the playing end in a 3-4 doesn't give you great stats. According to ESPN devito had 59 tackles and 2 forced fumbles last season.

    Would the 1st-2nd round 3-4 end prospects put up better numbers, and/or just be overall better players (by getting our olb sacks because they're occuping a double team) than an undrafted guy like devito?

    PS... yes i know we would be drafting a 3-4 end to replace ellis and not devito, but i used devito as the example because he's the less talented of the two. So i figured 1st and 2nd round prospects should have much better stats than him. But feel free to flame away you assholes!:smile:
     
  9. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    Kerrigan is not a 3-4 end.
     
  10. WW85

    WW85 MOCKERATOR
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    13,483
    Likes Received:
    959
    Trade up for a player that is best as 4-3 end and not a 3-4 OLB.

    If I'm trading up to 15, it's for JJ Watt or Cam Jordan.
     
  11. CodeGreen

    CodeGreen Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2010
    Messages:
    1,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would trade up, just not for a first round pick next year
     
  12. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    Can we add cimini to the Florio/Prisco banned list?
     
  13. Mambo9

    Mambo9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    8,906
    Likes Received:
    41
    1) That is just so not true. We have a solid D in terms of personnel... some positions can be upgraded but don't make it sound like we're in shit mode.

    2) Who cares if he's undrafted... sometimes you get lucky with undrafted players. Sometimes you get unlucky with 1st rd picks... but the rd you're picked in isn't a measure of your actual talent... just how good/bad NFL personnel is at evaluating talent.
     
    #13 Mambo9, Apr 1, 2011
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2011
  14. ........

    ........ Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    This, although I think Watt will be gone at that point.
     
  15. WW85

    WW85 MOCKERATOR
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    13,483
    Likes Received:
    959


    FWIW, Watt last to #17 in our TGG Mock draft!!

    Which IMO, was a steal.
     
  16. MBGreen

    MBGreen Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    1
    1000x this.
     
  17. gsulli5861

    gsulli5861 New Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think it bares watching. Kerrigan is a riser in the draft and Mike T. believes in quality over quantity. Don't forget Tannebaum was willing to trade a future #1 for Percy Harvin. I think Kerrigan is a perfect fit but I to would have to swallow hard for next yrs #1. If you use the draft table the Jet's would have to give up their entire draft to go from 30 to 20. So a #1 next year is not out of line especially when we expect that it will be a very late #1.
     
  18. WW85

    WW85 MOCKERATOR
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2003
    Messages:
    13,483
    Likes Received:
    959
    Kerrigan is NOT a perfect fit for the Jet's defense. Kerrigan's best position is at 4-3 DE.

    I love Kerrigan , but not for the Jet's defense.
     
  19. FJF

    FJF 2018 MVP Joe Namath Award Winner

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    27,721
    Likes Received:
    31,387
    i thought i read somewhere tanny stating he likes to view each draft as individual and as such doesn't like trading future picks for the present draft.so i'd say no chance in hell of this happening.

    that said,if he wants to move up for an olb/pass rusher i'd be good with it.if we keep the team prettymuch intact we are only a pass rusher away from being a serious frontrunner this year
     
  20. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    We moved from 17 to 5 with a 2nd round pick and a few role players.....no way I'd trade a future 1st to move up a similar amount to a worse pick for a worse player.
     

Share This Page