Taylor only wants to play for the Jets

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by JETSJETSJETS17, Mar 2, 2011.

  1. rinvesto

    rinvesto Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Messages:
    574
    Likes Received:
    341
    Bring him back for the minimum. He was a good jet
     
  2. CatoTheElder

    CatoTheElder 2009 Comeback Poster of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    Messages:
    15,367
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have no problem with bringing him back for minimum money and limited snaps. Despite his lacking pass rush he did have some good plays in the running game.

    But for the love of fuck I really hope Rex and Pettine don't ever ask him to cover on another play.
     
  3. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agreed.

    Not to mention it would be nice to have a vet that could share some knowledge with the couple of pass rushers we end up drafting next year. Not to mention keeping JT makes BT more expendable imo
     
  4. alleycat9

    alleycat9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    8,945
    Likes Received:
    1,787
    fuck him. he was a douche then, he sucked last year and he is a douche now.

    you guys would sell your soul to even have a chance at a championship. to say you would sign a guy that is as big of a cunt as jason taylor with no guarantee to win anything... ugh it makes me sick. he brings us nothing and is completely useless let him rot elsewhere.
     
  5. JetRizing89

    JetRizing89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,012
    Likes Received:
    60
    for the minimum as a veteran presence and a backup why not

    in a season where fa is gonna be really screwed up and there may not be training camp why not just role with a guy who knows the system and wants to be here
     
  6. Scikotic

    Scikotic Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2005
    Messages:
    11,408
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'll take him back for the vet's minimum. Clearly he can still play a bit. Crushing Brady and causing a safety are two of the plays that come to mind.

    If we don't want him back, I won't lose sleep though. He's still a fag.
     
  7. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,459
    Likes Received:
    858
    I wouldn't mind bringing him back for inequality more year. But it would depend on who we have here though.
     
  8. ace_o_spades

    ace_o_spades New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,391
    Likes Received:
    1
    You say that like its a bad thing.
     
  9. soxxx

    soxxx Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,890
    Likes Received:
    518
    Vet minumum would be fine. I think he will get that to. Having him as a backup isnt that bad. Alot better than having someone like Gholston sitting around. Plus his presence is felt.
     
  10. IrishSteveZ

    IrishSteveZ New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Messages:
    5,729
    Likes Received:
    0
    Offer him the vet min. He'll come back
     
  11. thatisjetsfootball

    thatisjetsfootball Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    553
    Likes Received:
    36
    He was out of there by the end I'd love to see him win a ring with the jets!
     
  12. KOZ

    KOZ Totally Addicted

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Messages:
    7,609
    Likes Received:
    0
    he was always late to games!
     
  13. Miamipuck

    Miamipuck New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2006
    Messages:
    11,429
    Likes Received:
    1
    For Vet min I wouldn't mind him back at all. If only to tweak a guy like alleycat.
     
  14. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    He's not my first choice, but if we can't get pass rushing help elsewhere, I'm not opposed to bringing back Taylor.
     
  15. TommyGreen

    TommyGreen Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    8,564
    Likes Received:
    2
    He produced a key safety for us, and had other clutch sacks. Not sure why many of you are claiming he was ineffective.
     
  16. Barry the Baptist

    Barry the Baptist Hello son, would you like a lolly?
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2003
    Messages:
    17,747
    Likes Received:
    1,577
    I'd take him back, he had some big plays for us. He had the sack on Brady that sealed the 1st win for us. He had a huge play on McCoy in the Browns game and he got the safety in the Steelers game. His stats weren't mind blowing but he wasn't as bad as people want to say he was either.
     
  17. mystikol

    mystikol New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,038
    Likes Received:
    0
    There's a pretty good chance he's more valuable than the 53rd guy/last guy in the front 7 rotation. That will depend on how good an offseason/draft we have.

    If that happens, there's no reason to not have him back, except for hatred.

    It's amazing how Rex Ryan and this team can change a man's perspective so much in a single season.
     
  18. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    It'd only make sense to bring him back if it was for the vet min and BT has been cut. Hopefully, there's someone new starting opposite Pace with a draftee and one of BT/JT as the backups.
     
  19. Andy_M

    Andy_M Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Messages:
    1,176
    Likes Received:
    460
    +1....for veteran min he's still a steal. Love him or hate him, he does have a lot of experience he can offer the younger guys.
     
  20. JetsUK

    JetsUK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2003
    Messages:
    6,914
    Likes Received:
    2,901
    I'd be happy enough to see him back for the right (read low) price.
     

Share This Page