The Patriots dont stand a fucking snowball's chance in hell. We have the advantage in every aspect. Special teams, defense, offense and coaching. We have the better quarterback, running backs, head coach, recievers, corners and practically every position. I find it hilarious that people think the Patriots can even make this a close game. 52-0 Jets.
LOL- Exactly, because we obviously can't make adjustments but the Pats can. Did any of these moron Patsy fans (not all of you), watch the JETS-colts game? That was a brand new style of play for our team, hardly any blitzing with a ton of DBs. Now that it's on film I can't wait to see it mixed up, should confuse Brady unless he asked Peyton to help him study. :wink:
Personally I think Brady looks less dorky than he did a few years ago. I think that's why he married a model. To give him tips on how he looks. It clearly wasn't for the sex. Best I can do.
Hypothetical question for ya. I understand the continued backlash against Spygate, so I'm not trying to defend or justify anything here. Just a question. Belichick worked under Parcells for years. Part of that time they were both with the NYJ. Will your opinion change if, at some point, it comes out that the same thing (videotaping signals) was done in NY? Because it's not likely that it started in New England in 2000 when Belichick arrived. The Jets had some decent success under Parcells, right? No titles, but they did go 12-4 in '98 and made the AFCCG.
Lemme see. Pats were not the same team in the second encounter as in the first. Okay, let's see where this goes. Jets, who beat Pitt and Indy on the road since then, are they the same team as on 12/5?
Actually I'm sure it was for the sex. What's Brady answer when he was asked about his hair. "My wife likes it" I can't think of a better answer.
Up to a point, a fair question. But here's the thing - BP has had success for a longer period of time, coaching in three other cities, had relative success everywhere, and I've never heard of anything to suggest HE cheated.
That's the thing though... I don't think, in coaching circles in the NFL in the 70s and 80s and even the 90s, when Belichick and Parcells were working as assistants first and learning the craft, that this type of thing was really considered "cheating." Teams have been trying (by means that are within the rules and also outside of the rules) to do that for decades. In other words, I don't think Belichick created the concept of videotaping defensive signals. He probably learned it somewhere, from someone. I'm not saying that someone is Parcells, but it could be, and I think it's naive to assume that it only happened in NE. Again, not trying to justify anything. Just a hypothetical.
And it looks like the Jets recovered their running mojo just in time for the Patriots. So next to the question of how can the Jets D defense the Patriots passing attack is how will the Patriots defend against the Jets running attack (and play-action). I say play-action because Sanchez will probably need to do that as well and should have a good chance of being effective if the run is working. I'm sure Belichick is working hard to figure out a way to best nullify the run (and protect against that play-action). It sounds simple in some ways but there are plenty of ways to mix it up and run the ball. My best hope is that the Patriots D will be able to force at least a few 3rd and longs. They are getting better. Even if they seem to be getting pushed around, they've better able to come up with the big stop or turnover. Should be interesting.
Yeah I heard that was a big game... :wink: Wasn't that before they wore helmets or something? :smile:
I wouldnt mention Woodhead. He might not even play and if he does, one hit from a LB will put him out.
Of course they are. It only works for the Pats, don't you remember? The Pats are as good as their best game. The Jets are as bad as their worst game.
What if Woodhead fumbles like 3 times, all recovered by Jets, then after the game celebrates with the Jets? Could be the best thing ever! :up: :lol:
