Bizarre Defensive Stat

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by hazmat, Dec 21, 2010.

  1. hazmat

    hazmat New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jets defense has given up 21 passing touchdowns while only intercepting 7 passes.

    The strange stat is that opposing teams are only completing 50% of their passes.
     
  2. dcm1602

    dcm1602 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    4,895
    Likes Received:
    0
    Its not really that bizzare

    I mean when you blitz as much as we do teams are going to have lower completion percentages, and since we have less guys dropped back into coverage less ints.

    But holy shit, we have the fewest INTs in the nfl, now that is pretty crazy
     
    #2 dcm1602, Dec 21, 2010
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2010
  3. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    The real question is how does the YPA stat stack up.

    The other thing is the Jets for whatever reason are 32nd in the league for interceptions. Yikes, that is not good.
     
  4. Big Blocker

    Big Blocker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    Messages:
    13,104
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    It's also worth noting despite that blowout loss to NE that the Jets are still not too shabby on total points given up. In that connection the 21 passing TD's is perhaps not too great, but that goes along with only 9 rushing TD's.
     
  5. RunLeonRun

    RunLeonRun Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    2,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    Didn't we give up just 8 last season?

    Our blitzes just don't work this year.
     
  6. Acad23

    Acad23 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Messages:
    27,031
    Likes Received:
    21,392
    Our guys never seem to be in position to make picks. I don't know if that's the way they're coached or what.

    Lack of pass rush doesn't help either. Same with lack of tipped balls.

    Overall...I blame Cromartie!
     
  7. steves850

    steves850 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,037
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree we've never needed a pass rusher more than we do now. Imagine how this D would be with a true rusher?
     
  8. dwalsh

    dwalsh 2006 TGG.com Rookie of the Year Award Winner

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4,735
    Likes Received:
    6
    it's also that teams just aren't throwing at Revis, and a lot of teams haven't been challenging Cromartie either; obviously there are exceptions to both.

    When teams are throwing on LBs, Safeties, and nickel CBs, you're not going to get as many picks
     
  9. hazmat

    hazmat New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    0
    Penalties:

    Jets have committed 97 for 875 Yards

    Opposition has committed 65 for 633 Yards

    Jets are +5 in turnovers.
     
  10. KJet84

    KJet84 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2006
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    1
    Personally..I think the lack of interceptions and giving up passing TDs has a lot to do with our personnel packages. I just think we sub way too much and don't give our rushers up front a chance to learn throughout the game how to best attack an O Lineman.
     
  11. hazmat

    hazmat New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think the problem is that we don't have any pass rushers that can beat someone with a move as opposed to just out numbering a defense with a 7 vs 6 blitz. Teams have figured out that A) Unless we rush 6 or 7 we have no shot at pressuring the QB B) If you max protect those crazy blitzes are completely shut down C) If the Jets rush 3 or 4 they are never touching the QB and the QB can take a nap D) if our defense sits back in a zone we don't have the speed at linebacker to cover the middle of the field.

    The bottom line is that the defense isn't very good because they can't pressure the QB with 4 or 5 rushers. Jenkins would have made the pass rush so much better.
     
  12. JoeWillie130

    JoeWillie130 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,362
    Likes Received:
    55
    I think it's a combination of a few things. Number one being no one throws at revis this year. Last year they threw to him all year and he constantly made them pay with pass break ups and int's. I didn't look this up but I believe he had 6 last year. Then theres the fact that teams are picking up our blitzes better and also have gotten the ball out quickly often making shorter safer throws. Another thing is that we had sheppard and strickland as our two and three last year(at least when healthy). Sure cromartie is an upgrade over sheppard but sheppard was solid and strickland is a much better corner than anyone we throw out there as a third this yr. We also had to deal with the revis hamstring and more recently the leonhard injury. That all adds up to 21 td's and seven int's.
     
  13. hazmat

    hazmat New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    0
    You would rather have Sheppard and Strickland? Sheppard is one of the word cover corners I've ever seen and Strickland can't stay on the field. The cornerbacks are better this year and Pool is a better tackler then Rhodes but probably a drop off in coverage.

    The difference between this last year and last year is the pass rush. No pass rush equals no secondary that can survive.
     
  14. truthbtold

    truthbtold Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2008
    Messages:
    2,892
    Likes Received:
    1,611
    Despite all this, somehow we're ranked 9th against the pass. Not bad statistically ... and yet while I watch the games it seems like our pass defense totally sucks this year. I can't ever remember a defense that gave up more 1st downs on 3rd and 10 or longer, and got so few interceptions.

    Despite what the numbers might say, this pass defense has been a major disappointment at best, and at times ... totally embarrassing.
     
    #14 truthbtold, Dec 21, 2010
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2010
  15. JoeWillie130

    JoeWillie130 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,362
    Likes Received:
    55
    I think Strickland was very underrated for us last yr. Was letting him go the right move sure because as we both mentioned he had problems staying on the field. It's tough to play with only two guys who can cover in this league and we see that week in and week out with teams exploiting Coleman, Wilson earlier in the year and lowery.

    Sheppard was solid for us last year but faded at the end and ended up in the dog house. I think that and Strickland being injured in the Indy game was really what allowed manning to light up our d.
     
    #15 JoeWillie130, Dec 21, 2010
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2010
  16. NYJets4EverOnTop

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2004
    Messages:
    730
    Likes Received:
    0
    Strickland was let go because he couldn't stay on the field, had nothing to do with his play.
     
  17. JetsKickAss

    JetsKickAss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2004
    Messages:
    6,602
    Likes Received:
    1,648
    Kris Jenkins ALWAYS took 2 guys with him...that's why the blitzes worked early in 2009.
     
  18. JoeWillie130

    JoeWillie130 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,362
    Likes Received:
    55
    Good point. Jenkins was a bigger loss to our pass d than our run defense. He would g
    Push the pocket on pass plays and like you said draw the double teams. Really opens things up.
     
  19. All Star

    All Star Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    0
    FYI, we have three more sacks this year than we did all of last year...
     

Share This Page