With Game on the Line, onside kick or kick deep?

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by gustoonarmy, Nov 8, 2010.

?

With Game on the Line, onside kick or kick deep?

  1. Kick deep

    59 vote(s)
    81.9%
  2. Onside kick

    10 vote(s)
    13.9%
  3. I don't know, I'm just really confused right now

    3 vote(s)
    4.2%
  1. MadBacker Prime

    MadBacker Prime THE Dead Rabbit

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    10,752
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rex trusted his defense, it just proves he's not bullshitting everyone, he really believes in our team and it shows. Calls like that go a long way in the locker room.
     
  2. RunLeonRun

    RunLeonRun Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    2,705
    Likes Received:
    0
    I wanted the onside kick. At best we were looking at the ball back with just over a minute and no timeouts. People talk about how the Jets got lucky with Shwartz throwing the ball to stop the clock. What about losing 15 seconds on the sanchez TD? that was huge.
     
  3. milo

    milo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,951
    Likes Received:
    291
    Had Suh hit the extra point and they're up by four I think Rex would've onside-kicked. That's a far more desperate situation given the time left.

    Either way I'm sure Rex was convinced we'd stop them, but I don't think he'd chance it coming down to a 90 yard TD drive.

    Down by three you kick deep, stop, get it back at the 20 worst case. That's only 50-55 yards needed.

    Had the Lions played it correctly it still would've been difficult to do - lucky for us they shot themselves in the foot with the clock management - but it's higher success rate than an onsides.
     
  4. Italian Seafood

    Italian Seafood New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,545
    Likes Received:
    3
    It comes down to time left. With one timeout and the 2:00 warning there was time to get a 3-and-out and get the ball back, so you want the better field position as you will need to get in FG range with no more imteouts and limited time. If it was after the 2:00 warning and one timeout I think they'd have onsides kicked.
     
  5. rex-N-effects

    rex-N-effects New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    498
    Likes Received:
    0
    If u have a good defense. u always kick deep as long as you know you can get the ball back with about 1 minute and 30 secs left. if you can't and they can kill it or almost kill it no matter what, then you go for the onside kick
     
  6. Italian Seafood

    Italian Seafood New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,545
    Likes Received:
    3
    The Lions cost themselves about 40 seconds, so it wouldn't have been impossible but harder for us to get in FG range in time. Had they made the extra point we'd of course have gone for 2 after Sanchez's TD, and depending on how that went might have onsides kicked if we failed the 2. Without Detroit's incomplete on 3rd down or the late hit we don't use the handoff to Greene at the end either, we'd have to play it differently but it could have been done.
     
  7. gustoonarmy

    gustoonarmy 2006-2007 TGG.com Best International Poster of the

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,174
    Likes Received:
    160
    I reckon alot had to do with the conversation Rex had with Westy. My guess is the MW said go long and hope for a fumble, if not pin them deep.
     
  8. Italian Seafood

    Italian Seafood New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,545
    Likes Received:
    3
    The other thing is you know their QB was out of the game and there was a real good chance of getting the ball back with little time and needing a FG, so the question is where do you get it? I think that's why they kicked it deep.
     
  9. Jets n Boys

    Jets n Boys Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,203
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would go deep. With the timeouts and about 3 mins on the board, we could have afforded one FD and still would have had a chance. And the way the D started to play, we had a better chance of getting the ball and getting the FG than getting ball after a possible Lions FG and trying to go for a TD. There was a similar issue in the GB game where Ryan had to decide going for it on 4th down or punt/FG. We went for it, failed, GB went 3 and out and punt. Their punt put us in a hole.
     

Share This Page