Yep I just ESPN 1050. Apparently Revis' agent spilled the beans on a golf course. He is expected at camp Thursday.
you continue to avoid the point of the argument, pretend that you helped me out with "something", and seek gratitude for your inability to defend yourself. I supposed there are some things 8,000+ posts don't teach you.
It wasnt directly from Revis's agent it was a source close the agent stating a deal is going to completed sometime thursday. Take it for what its worth but any positive news to further give credit to TC's news is worht taking and running with for us Jets fans. Lets hope this is true
wait what? i thought he said it was from revis' agent (john geiger) i was in the other room so didnt hear it 100% okay, so revis will be on hardknocks tomorrow, and the deal will be ink'd thursday.
So far, all the new news has been positive (I don't consider re-hashing the 40 million apart report immediately after Cowlishaw dropped the 'insider info' news "new news"). Let's hope it's tru
Apparently they at least teach me how to continuously engage a poster who maintains he doesn't wish to be engaged. Particularly impressive given how blah the original post was and how undeserving of lengthy discussion. I suppose I should give you credit for pulling the following posts out of your ass in order to further the discussion. Bravo. Two cookies for you today.
It's at least something. We haven't seen anything corroborative thus far other than personal references for TC.
At this point I could care less if the Jets wanted to milk the Revis story for Hard Knocks. Yeah it's fucked up to us fans, but I dont care now. (I HIGHLY doubt they were making this shit up tho)
I doubt that, it's possible they made significant progress the last couple days and Revis wanted it to be a big story (he is Mr Manhattan after all) for Hard Knocks so he wanted to coordinate it as much. But for the holdout and shit to just be a giant ploy for Hard Knocks I don't buy it
i doubt it was a ploy either, but i also dont think a deal is really close to being done...not to be neg but if i dont hear it from a reliable source and not just he say she say...i dont believe it
if blah posts are defined by one line posts, and at minimum two lines of posts are required for a lengthier discussion, I suppose I wasn't too shabby. Then again, I wonder how many of your 8,000 posts are longer than blah? opinions of _______ (notice how i didn't call you any names?) are in fact what you'd call "blah". and to think that you were at least for a bit worthy of a debate. shame on me. you can move on now as I don't want to help you cheat and boost your post counts even further.
