Harris & Mangold.....

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by mezzavo, Aug 10, 2010.

  1. mezzavo

    mezzavo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    6,552
    Likes Received:
    3,226
    Now that, in my mind, the "other" contract issue is going nowhere...who thinks it's time to start talking to Mangold and Harris?

    I think it's time and would go a loooonnnggg way to solidifying the "team" attitude and show some love and reward those men that put their personal things aside and showed to camp. THAT is what I would do.

    Do any of our capologists know what the going rate is for a top center and let's say a top 15 linebacker?? I think that is where you start.

    It sends a message to the team that we realize we can't appease the lunatic and his management team over there...but here, we can take care of our other men. BEFORE the season. If I'm a player that just solidifies how much of an "island" the other guy is on.

    Let's get this thread rolling for "show some love" to Mangold and Harris...THIS season! The two of them combined won't even touch what MEvis is asking for so I say pull the trigger. That let's us focus on the one or two 1yr. free agents we'll have to lock up next year or the year after.

    What sayest thou??

    Harris & Mangold in 2010!!!!

    Peace!
    The Mezz
     
  2. TommyGreen

    TommyGreen Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    8,564
    Likes Received:
    2
    The Jets are not going to lock up two of the most expensive players on the team without knowing what the next CBA will look like. That would be gross negligence on their part.
     
  3. theBidet

    theBidet Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,244
    Likes Received:
    0
    this.
    thread over.
     
  4. MBGreen

    MBGreen Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't think Tanny will deviate from the Revis situation at this point in time or the near future.

    Besides....he's already stated that Mangold and Harris's contracts won't be addressed till next offseason.
     
  5. mezzavo

    mezzavo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    6,552
    Likes Received:
    3,226
    Ughhhh....a man can dream can't he...and IF they were willing to "lock up" MEvis then they should be in a position to "lock up" two players who won't combine to what he wants. Period.
     
  6. mezzavo

    mezzavo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    6,552
    Likes Received:
    3,226
    I don't know my man...how much more can they focus on this situation. It almost seems futile in it's attempts. ce la vie....
     
  7. theBidet

    theBidet Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,244
    Likes Received:
    0
    c'est la vie is what i think you're going for not trying to be a typo nazi... i've spelt it horribly worse in the past. just an fyi :up:
     
  8. TommyGreen

    TommyGreen Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Messages:
    8,564
    Likes Received:
    2
    How do you know that Harris and Mangold won't demand Revis money? If the Jets open negotiations with them who the hell knows what will happen. That's a risk they're definitely not going to take right now. Mangold and Harris are fine with waiting until the end of the season when things become clearer, so there's no incentive for the Jets to jeopardize a season just because you think it might help team chemistry, which is fine by the way.
     
  9. AlioTheFool

    AlioTheFool Spiveymaniac

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2005
    Messages:
    13,601
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry, but I think Mangold and Harris should get their new deals now too. If Revis gets anything this year, it's going to be without regard for a new cap, so blaming the CBA situation for not signing them is smoke and mirrors.
     
  10. Hemi

    Hemi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    Messages:
    11,822
    Likes Received:
    571
    Suprised no one brought up Mangold and Harris before.
     
  11. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    I really think Tanny wants to get the big deal done first so he knows what he has to work with. He obviously needs more freedom with the size and structure with the Revis deal.

    If the negotiations end with that one, then I can see him doing it.
     
  12. MBGreen

    MBGreen Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    1
    it's seems futile to us......because we're not privvy to what's going behind closed doors.
     
  13. MBGreen

    MBGreen Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    1
    this.


    I can't see Tanny starting up negotiations with 2 other core players....while the Revis situation is in a deadlock.
     
  14. AbdulSalam

    AbdulSalam New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    4,575
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is no reason to do anything w/Harris or Mangold now before the new CBA is in place. There is further no reason to do anything w/Harris or Mangold while the Revis situation is being addressed. Its funny that some here don't get these simple realities.
     
  15. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    Why is it a "simple reality?"

    I don't think it'll happen just because neither player seems to be a big problem, and Revis is more important to the team's success than Harris. Mangold is arguable. If they decided to give Mangold a new contract, I'd have no problem with it. I don't want to let him go.

    No CBA didn't prevent the Jets from signing D'Brick long-term.
     
  16. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    The D'Brick deal actually cleared cap space for the next 2 years, making it easier to sign the other 3. Those guys will do the opposite.
     
  17. wewantsapp

    wewantsapp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,420
    Likes Received:
    1,104
    I think we should lock up David Harris long term before he goes out & puts up another All-Pro caliber season (he was on the AP 2nd team). If he does it again, we'll have to pay him top LB $$.

    We already know Mangold has to be the highest paid center in the NFL, so we can wait on that.
    Revis? -- who knows where this is going.
     
  18. Jetfanmack

    Jetfanmack haz chilens?

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,496
    Likes Received:
    314
    Still, it's a big risk to go into next offseason with both Mangold and Harris UFAs. We can franchise one, and I think we can transition tag the other, but we still have to get deals done.
     
  19. smelly_joe

    smelly_joe New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    115
    Likes Received:
    0
    im absolutely rooting for harris to have a great season, but you're right, he can only fly under the radar for so long. he's poised to have a great year this year, and especially if we go far into the playoffs, letting him become a free agent could be dangerous. he could take us for a ton of money, or worse still sign somewhere else.
     
  20. wewantsapp

    wewantsapp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,420
    Likes Received:
    1,104
    Exactly.
    As far as I'm concerned, the Revis contract is the one that can wait because it appears to be most dependent upon the terms of the new CBA.
    Mangold will probably get the 1 year franchise tag after this season.
     

Share This Page