Why not take an OT in Round 1?

Discussion in 'Draft' started by JetsFanatic389, Apr 16, 2010.

  1. JetsFanatic389

    JetsFanatic389 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    There really isn't any speculation regarding the Jets taking an OT with their first pick and I'm just now starting to wonder why. This OT class is pretty good and I think there will be talent available at the end of the first round:

    Anthony Davis
    Charles Brown
    Bruce Campbell
    Roger Saffold

    All four of these guys will be gone by our 2nd round pick so why not take one of them with our 1st? Yes, the Jets will need to address their pass rush but I think that can be addressed with our second pick. As far as OT talent after these four, I think there's a big drop.

    Why not got OT in the 1st and take a DE/OLB in the 2nd?
     
  2. ToonWalker

    ToonWalker New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,775
    Likes Received:
    0
    If an OT is at the top of the Jets draft board at 29 and they feel the value is too good to pass up, he'll be picked.

    I don't think it's likely, but it's possible.
     
  3. CatoTheElder

    CatoTheElder 2009 Comeback Poster of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    Messages:
    15,367
    Likes Received:
    0
    I really don't see the value at OT being there at 29. It's typically not a good idea to use you're 1st rounder on a RT anyway, especially not in this draft. Although if someone does fall then I wouldn't mind the pick at all.
     
  4. MBGreen

    MBGreen Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    1
  5. rhodesfan16

    rhodesfan16 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,119
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bruce Campbell is not as much of a work out worrier that everyone thinks he is.

    Also we shouldnt take an OT (unless their is no other reasonable choice) because you dont want to select a player in the first round that wont have a more immediate impact their rookie year. At this point I dont see a vacancy at either tackle spot until at least next season, maybe even letter
     
  6. JetsFanatic389

    JetsFanatic389 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah so in order to make a more fluid transition next year if one of our vets leaves wouldn't it be wise to draft a guy a year before? Plus we need the depth for this year.
     
  7. CatoTheElder

    CatoTheElder 2009 Comeback Poster of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    Messages:
    15,367
    Likes Received:
    0
    This. Woody is 32 and likely done with the Jets after this season. I would rather spend a high pick on his replacement now rather than throw a rookie in their to go through his growing pains while Sanchez is still only in his 3rd season.
     
  8. Jetskees

    Jetskees New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    507
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well then at least the colts won't get him.
     
  9. rhodesfan16

    rhodesfan16 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,119
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think thats kind of a down approach to looking at it. I understand what your saying and obviously a first round tackle having spent a year learning the blocking schemes etc does help. However, first round players (even low first round) are first rounders because of their impact on your team. We arent in a situation where Woody is just so god awful that if we did draft a tackle in the first, he would sub in for Woody on a frequent basis.

    If your talking about fluid transitions, thats the time you talk about taking a late round pick and developing him, a tackle with a plus tool or someone who is a few steps away from becoming an elite player. Its not just like a random thing that Robert Turner is still on the team, the coaching staff obviously see's some potential in him. Now he could just as equally blow up and be terrible but we dont know that
     
  10. JetsFanatic389

    JetsFanatic389 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    Starting OTs drafted between picks 20-60:

    2009
    Michael Oher - Round 1 - Pick 23
    Eben Britton - Round 2 - Pick 7
    Phil Loadholt - Round 2 - Pick 22

    2008
    Sam Baker - Round 1 - Pick 21
    Duane Brown - Round 1 - Pick 26

    2007
    Joe Staley - Round 1 - Pick 26

    2006
    Winston Justice - Round 2 - Pick 7
    Andrew Whitworth - Round 2 - Pick 23

    2005
    Michael Roos - Round 2 - Pick 9


    There are a few guys who were projected as OTs but moved to OGs that I did not include in this list.
    I was actually surprised to see that there really weren't many OL picked during this time of the draft that aren't starters.
    I feel like this shows that historically there is starting OT caliber talent late in the first round.
     
  11. DraftaFullBack

    DraftaFullBack Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,122
    Likes Received:
    2
    He is the textbook definition of a workout warrior. Based only on his game tape he is a fifth rounder if he is lucky, yet he is being talked about as a first rounder.
     
  12. CatoTheElder

    CatoTheElder 2009 Comeback Poster of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    Messages:
    15,367
    Likes Received:
    0
    +1. Bruce Campbell is Gholston on the OLine.
     
  13. MBGreen

    MBGreen Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    1
    per rotoworld

    If i hear this motherfucker's name called when the #29 pick is up....I'm going on a shooting spree.
     
  14. JetsFanatic389

    JetsFanatic389 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    This isn't a Bruce Campbell thread...Davis, Brown and Saffold could all be available.
     
  15. CatoTheElder

    CatoTheElder 2009 Comeback Poster of the Year

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    Messages:
    15,367
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've seen Anthony Davis all over the first round. No one seems to be able to rank him consistently.
     
  16. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    yeah, all the prospects I truly love all had their stock rise to far for the jets to get them.

    Oh well.
     
  17. KleckoNamathToon

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2007
    Messages:
    196
    Likes Received:
    16
    I agree depth at tackle is scary, more so than in the interior, but like Rhodesfan16 said, a first round pick should make an impact this year. Even though we are stronger going into this draft than we have been for years, we still need an impact player at #3 cb, a pass rusher, a DE and maybe a safety. Hopefully our round 1 and 2 picks fill two of these needs.
     
  18. Imagesrdecieving

    Imagesrdecieving Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,512
    Likes Received:
    902
    One injury on the Oline and our first round tackle would be making an impact. I don't think we need an Olineman regardless of value - but if the price is right...
     
  19. Green Hurricane

    Green Hurricane Footsteps Falco

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    Messages:
    7,728
    Likes Received:
    0
    If it's Anthony Davis, it's an absolute yes, anyone else no. I think the Jets would want a mauler to replace Woody, and those guys really don't fit the bill. They're all more athletic/technique based LT types.
     
  20. mystikol

    mystikol New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,038
    Likes Received:
    0
    What about Iupati?
     

Share This Page