Salary Cap in 2011

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by hazmat, Mar 5, 2010.

  1. talisaynon

    talisaynon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,653
    Likes Received:
    216
    :metal::metal::metal::metal::metal:
     
  2. talisaynon

    talisaynon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,653
    Likes Received:
    216
    To tell you the truth: what would be buying?

    We DRAFTED DBrick, Manigold, Revis AND Harris. Now you're telling us we can't pay for our players? Fuck that noise.

    NO CAP!
     
  3. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    I'm putting this info from nyjetscap.com in here as a point of reference.

    Code:
    	Year  	 Salary Cap Number  	 Dead Money if Cut  	 Cap Savings if Cut
    [B]D'Brick[/B]
    	2007	$3,980,880		$12,887,500		-$8,906,620
    	2008	$5,397,500		$10,310,000		-$4,912,500
    	2009	$6,000,000		$7,732,500		-$1,732,500
    	2010	$7,200,000		$5,155,000		$2,045,000
    	2011	$12,577,500		$2,577,500
    	
    [B]Mangold	[/B]
    	2007	$1,678,880		$3,530,000		-$1,851,120
    	2008	$1,450,500		$2,647,500		-$1,197,000
    	2009	$1,613,000		$1,765,000		-$152,000
    	2010	$4,502,500		$882,500		$3,620,000
    	
    [B]Harris[/B]
    	2007	$635,000		$1,400,000		-$765,000
    	2008	$1,121,720		$1,050,000		$71,720
    	2009	$810,000		$700,000		$110,000
    	2010	$900,000		$350,000		$550,000
    
    [B]Washington	[/B]
    	2007	$473,192		$321,938		$151,254
    	2008	$552,312		$214,626		$337,686
    	2009	$642,314		$107,314		$535,000
    	2010	$1,759,000		$0			$1,759,000	
    	
    [B]Cromartie[/B]
    	2010	$1,229,780		$0			$1,229,780	
    	
    [B]Edwards[/B]
    	2009	$3,854,412		$0			$3,854,412
    	2010	$5,705,000		$0			$5,705,000
    
    [B]Ellis	[/B]
    	2008	$5,302,059		$4,450,000		$852,059
    	2009	$6,601,471		$2,225,000		$4,376,471
    	2010	$3,350,000		$0			$3,350,000
    	
    	
    [B]Revis[/B]
    	2007	$1,401,916		$11,000,000		-$9,598,804
    	2008	$3,935,916		$12,010,584		-$8,074,668
    	2009	$7,525,916		$5,662,168		$1,863,748
    	2010	$1,915,916		$3,797,752		-$1,881,832
    	2011	$2,065,916		$2,531,836		-$465,920
    	2012	$2,080,920		$1,265,920		$815,000
    	
    [B]Keller[/B]
    	2008	$1,190,000		$6,000,000		-$4,810,000
    	2009	$1,329,780		$4,810,000		-$3,480,220
    	2010	$1,495,405		$3,487,500		-$1,992,095
    	2011	$1,702,400		$1,992,095		-$289,695
    	2012	$1,961,225		$660,000		$1,301,225
    	
    [B]Greene[/B]
    	2009	$536,250		$905,000		-$368,750
    	2010	$628,530		$678,750		-$50,220
    	2011	$713,350		$452,500		$261,030
    	2012	$798,530		$226,250		$572,280
    	
    	
    [B]Faneca[/B]
    	2008	$5,640,000		$21,000,000		-$15,360,000
    	2009	$8,090,000		$15,360,000		-$7,270,000
    	2010	$8,590,000		$7,270,000		$1,320,000
    	2011	$8,840,000		$1,680,000		$7,160,000
    	2012	$8,840,000		$840,000		$8,000,000
    	
    [B]Scott[/B]
    	2009	$8,200,000		$21,600,000		-$13,400,000
    	2010	$8,350,000		$12,600,000		-$4,250,000
    	2011	$6,650,000		$4,500,000		$2,150,000
    	2012	$7,350,000		$3,000,000		$4,350,000
    	2013	$8.650,000		$1,500,000		$7,150,000
    	2014	$8,000,000		$0			$8,000,000
    	
    [B]Pace[/B]
    	2008	$2,833,333		$21,500,000		-$18,666,667
    	2009	$6,936,862		$15,066,665		-$8,129,803
    	2010	$7,013,333		$12,053,332		-$5,039,999
    	2011	$7,118,333		$9.039,999		-$1,921,666
    	2012	$8,348,333		$6,026,666		$2,321,667
    	2013	$9,573,335		$3,013,333		$6,560,000
    
    [B]Sanchez	[/B]
    	2009	$2,545,000		$28,000,000		-$25,455,000
    	2010	$6,442,500		$25,455,500		-$19,012,500
    	2011	$13,500,000		$19,262,500		-$5,762,500
    	2012	$8,500,000		$5,762,500		$2,737,500
    	2013	$4,000,000		$0			$4,000,000	
    	
    [B]Rhodes[/B]
    	2008	$2,297,546		$20,105,000		-$17,807,454
    	2009	$5,752,666		$15,458,694		-$9,706,028
    	2010	$6,671,666		$7,530,668		-$618,002
    	2011	$4,557,666		$5,648,002		-$1,090,336
    	2012	$6,282,666		$3,765,336		$2,517,330
    	2013	$7,812,670		$1,882,670		$5,930,000
    	
    [B]Jenkins[/B]
    	2008	$5,900,000		$9,500,000		-$3,600,000
    	2009	$6,400,000		$3,350,000		$2,050,000
    	2010	$3,900,000		$2,700,000		$1,200,000
    	2011	$6,400,000		$1,800,000		$4,600,000
    	2012	$7,650,000		$900,000		$6,750,000
    
    [B]Ghost	[/B]
    	2008	$2,320,000		$21,000,000		-$18,680,000
    	2009	$4,470,000		$18,680,000		-$14,210,000
    	2010	$3,470,000		$14,210,000		-$10,740,000
    	2011	$3,570,000		$10,740,000		-$7,170,000
    	2012	$3,570,000		$7,170,000		-$3,600,000
    	
    
     
  4. hazmat

    hazmat New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    0
    Doesn't work like that or else every team would do it. You can't restructure your own players this off season and have their salary + prorated portion of salary cap equal more then 30% more then last years. You also can't restructure your own players to have a huge increase this year and decrease drastically next year. They put the 50% rule in effect so that a players salary can't decrease from 2010 to 2011 by more then 50%.

    The rules were basically created so that players under contract could not get rewarded with big contracts during the one year of no cap.
     
  5. GeshJet

    GeshJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2003
    Messages:
    691
    Likes Received:
    82
    EXACTLY. I suspect that once it's known for sure that there will be no CBA and thus no cap this season (I think that deadline is in May), we will see some of these players sign long term deals before this season starts. I suspect that will include Mangold, Harris, Brick and Revis. The big bonuses that will be paid presumably will not count going forward if a cap is later reinstated.
     
  6. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,811
    Likes Received:
    24,827
    Those rules are for the previous CBA, which is no longer valid. Stop jumping at shadows.
     
  7. talisaynon

    talisaynon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,653
    Likes Received:
    216
    So what are the rules then? I'd imagine some clause kicks in if there's a season with no cap.
     
  8. hazmat

    hazmat New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    0
    Those rules are for the 2010 season. Those rules govern what a team can do between now and March of 2011. What happens after that is anyones guess.
     
  9. GeshJet

    GeshJet Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2003
    Messages:
    691
    Likes Received:
    82
    Didn't realize that - thanks. Maybe my plan wouldn't work this offseason.
     
  10. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    No one knows what rules a new cap would entail because they haven't been defined yet.
     
  11. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,811
    Likes Received:
    24,827
    The rules he is talking about are concerning cap hits, and contract rules for the uncapped year in the final year of the current CBA, which expires on opening day 2011. Without a cap, there is no hit. Which is what we are kinda looking at right now. The new rules are being negotiated by the owners and the NFLPA, and probably won't even be known to fans and press until 2011, probably a while after an agreement is made.

    Once there is an agreement in place, there will undoubtedly be clauses in place to help teams make the transition from uncapped year to capped year.

    Which is why i can't help but view the premise of this thread, as well as this post from another thread:

    ... as alarmist BS. What's the use of tearing your clothes and pulling your hair over rules that don't exist yet?
     
    #31 abyzmul, Mar 5, 2010
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2010
  12. hazmat

    hazmat New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,227
    Likes Received:
    0
    As I said if they have a cap we are screwed. If the salary cap from 2009 continued on we would have serious problems keeping all of our own players. Add to the fact that our front office continues to trade draft picks for players that are on the verge of a large second contract.

    If they have no salary cap then the only issue with keeping these players would be Woody writing bigger checks.

    The 30 and 50 rules apply to this season. It would be very nice to give Mangold a huge contract now and get the signing bonus out of the way but it's not possible based on the previous agreement for the uncapped 2010 season.

    My major point is that regardless of what happens in 2011 and beyond, the front office has to stop giving away draft picks every year. Eventually having draft after draft where we only add one or two players will catch up with any team.
     
  13. MadBacker Prime

    MadBacker Prime THE Dead Rabbit

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    10,752
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not when we have a win now team, I will gladly mortgage our future for a championship now.

    We've had great draft too the past few years, the talent pool has been picked apart very well by Tanny.
     
    #33 MadBacker Prime, Mar 5, 2010
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2010
  14. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,811
    Likes Received:
    24,827
    That's something that we do not disagree on. While I like an aggressive approach in the FO, there has to come a time when draft picks contribute to the team in terms of quality depth.

    There may be some merit to the idea that 3-4 players that the FO is sure will contribute might be worth 7-8 players that the FO is sort of sure will contribute... but if our scouting department is really that good, they should be able to find players well in the lower rounds.

    Part of me thinks that one of the biggest reasons Tanny chose Rex was for his penchant to develop UDFAs so well, so MT could continue ot use draft picks as trade bait.
     

Share This Page