The Hiring Of Rex Ryan- NY Times

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by hwismer, Jan 23, 2010.

  1. BadgerOnLSD

    BadgerOnLSD Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    15,188
    Likes Received:
    3
    Not to mention the rest of our receivers are a converted QB, a RB, a ST gunner and David Clowney.
     
  2. freebo

    freebo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    0
    Maybe.

    I could say also all of Peyton?s losses weren't really his fault, but who's gonna believe me outside Indianapolis?
     
  3. BadgerOnLSD

    BadgerOnLSD Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    15,188
    Likes Received:
    3
    Maybe what? None of that was disputable.
     
  4. freebo

    freebo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Jets throw the ball less than anyone (or close to it).
     
  5. firemanedjr

    firemanedjr Active Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2008
    Messages:
    5,357
    Likes Received:
    1
    Wasn't Freebo considered a "good" troll?
     
  6. BadgerOnLSD

    BadgerOnLSD Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    15,188
    Likes Received:
    3
    But that doesn't mean Cotchery doesn't have great hands and Edwards isn't overly criticized.

    None of his drops have cost us a game.
     
  7. AbdulSalam

    AbdulSalam New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    4,575
    Likes Received:
    0
    yah i got something special for you to work with - its called we are gonna beat your ass tomorrow afternoon.
     
  8. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    So just like Colts fans assume we would have lost a 15-10 game, you assume our guys would have more drops if we throw more? I'm not saying they would or wouldn't but assumptions don't bode well in arguments.
     
  9. freebo

    freebo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah and I am trying really hard too.

    It was the perception on this board that the Jets were going to run the ball for over 170 yards on the Colts defense that made me shake my head and say something about it.

    I usually just let everything go as we are all fans, but that is just as disrespectful as it gets, in my opinion.
     
  10. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is disrespectful that we say we are going to run for our season average against an average rush D?
     
  11. freebo

    freebo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bring it on fuckers!!! :beer:
     
  12. GreenMachine

    Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2003
    Messages:
    12,528
    Likes Received:
    6
    Wait..The Jets are averaging 170 yards a game in the playoffs, and you think it is disrespectful we think we will do the same vs a team that allows more rush yards per game than the last 2 teams we played?
     
  13. freebo

    freebo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Colts don't have to make assumptions. We are favored for a reason.

    Be honest, if the Jets were favored by 7+ points then would you listen to anything I had to say? Be honest about that.
     
  14. freebo

    freebo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes I do. And yes it is disrespectful as shit.

    What you have done means nothing at this point, just as nothing we have done means nothing. To say the Jets are going to run for 170+ is just so far out there that I can?t begin to imagine a fan of any team saying.

    You just don?t predict 170+ rushing yard days.
     
  15. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would listen, but would still expect my team to win.

    I'm a Nets fan, and I still expect them to win every night, even though they are 3-40.
     
  16. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    Let me ask again, why is it ridiculous to guess that we are going to reach our season AVERAGE. We aren't predicting to run for 500, we are simply saying our average. This is the #1 Rush O for a reason.

    (just in case http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/average)
     
  17. Theo Huxtable

    Theo Huxtable New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,695
    Likes Received:
    0
    You're right. I predict a 200+ rushing yard day.:smile:
     
  18. AbdulSalam

    AbdulSalam New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    4,575
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't listen to you regardless of the point spread.
     
  19. freebo

    freebo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Messages:
    385
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's not the point. The point is there are favorites for a reason and the Jets rushing for 170+ would equate to the Jets being favored by 7 or even more.

    It?s just not plausible. Possible ? Yes, I will give you that (either team could do it). But plausible - No.
     
  20. 624

    624 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,894
    Likes Received:
    0
    Saying we will rush for 170 does not mean it is an automatic win, if that was the case we would be 16-0 this year, because it was our average. We ran for over 300 against the Bills and still lost.

    But Sanchez is over his mid-season slump.
     

Share This Page