ProFootball Weekly 2009 Preview... Jets dead last

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by Petrozza, Jun 15, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Petrozza

    Petrozza Administrator

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    14,271
    Likes Received:
    3,998
    Just bought the annual ProFootball Weekly season preview. They project the Jets to finish 7-9 and in the 4th place in AFC East.

    Patriots (13-3)
    Dolphins (9-7)
    Bills (7-9)
    Jets (7-9)

    Our position ratings are as follows:

    QB: C+
    RB: B+
    WR: C-
    OL: B+
    DL: B
    LB: B+
    DB: B+
    ST: B+
     
  2. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    that's a fair assumption.

    Tougher schedule, new QB, new coach. Its possible.

    Sophomore slump for the Fins.
     
  3. IrishSteveZ

    IrishSteveZ New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Messages:
    5,729
    Likes Received:
    0
    So we get mostly B's and B+'s yet we finish last? I guess they dont believe in our coaching staff. I for one finally do.

    I can't wait to see the nasty swagger this defense has!
     
  4. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    I don't think a 7-9 prediction is unreasonable.
     
  5. gustoonarmy

    gustoonarmy 2006-2007 TGG.com Best International Poster of the

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,174
    Likes Received:
    160
    If anything we finish above the Bills, thats worst case scenario. I wouldn't underestimate the phins, and of course, write off the Pats at your own risk.
     
  6. MBGreen

    MBGreen Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    1
    meh...I don't see the Phins going 9-7.....i think last year was a mirage in regards to their success.
     
  7. cassie96

    cassie96 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    993
    Likes Received:
    12

    As Michael Phelps would say, that is EXACTLY the bulletin board material that you need. :up:

    I hope there will be a copy in the locker room. :jets:
     
  8. vilmatic

    vilmatic Active Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    4,657
    Likes Received:
    12
    I understand what they are saying, but I just don't see it. I see 11-5. But that's just me.
     
  9. Petrozza

    Petrozza Administrator

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    14,271
    Likes Received:
    3,998
    Here are some player position ratings:

    RB: Thomas Jones at #15 with a rating of 3.45 (5.0 is the highest, they give Peterson a 4.5)

    TE: Dustin Keller at #11, 3.35 (listed as a player who has more upside)

    WR: Jerricho Cotchery is among top veteran prospects outside of the top 30. Coles, btw, is listed at #30 (3.25)

    C: Nick Mangold at #6, 3.55 (may have room to improve further)

    OG: Alan Faneca at #6, 3.70 (in decline)

    OT: D. Ferguson at #23, 3.15

    DE: Shaun Ellis at #15, 3.40

    DT: Kris Jenkins at #4, 4.00 (has a couple of more seasons in him)

    ILB: Bart Scott at #6, 3.80 and David Harris at #18, 3.40

    OLB: Calvin Pace at #12, 3.50

    CB: Darrelle Revis at #4, 3.90

    S: Kerry Rhodes at #11, 3.55

    return specialists: Leon Washington at #2, 3.80
     
  10. MBGreen

    MBGreen Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2008
    Messages:
    18,107
    Likes Received:
    1


    I would've figured Mangold was top 3...at the very least.
     
  11. agrich

    agrich New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2008
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    I love the NFL as much as anyone, but I hesitate to buy season previews published in June. Given typical printing lead times for those annual magazines (I work for one), that probably went to the printer about a week after the draft.
     
  12. NYCBillsFan

    NYCBillsFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,216
    Likes Received:
    81
    Welcome to my world guys.......
     
  13. mj2sexay

    mj2sexay Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,619
    Likes Received:
    8
    Mangold's better then 6. I certainly don't disagree that 7-9 might be the outcome this year, but I'm a little more optimistic. Granted you can't look at the schedule in June, and it's not like the Jets did well against the "easy" AFC West anyway but the NFC South has three tough teams. Bucs are crap.
     
  14. coorslightcans

    Joined:
    May 8, 2009
    Messages:
    498
    Likes Received:
    0
    pro football weekly better known as toilet paper. nobody wants to jump on the bandwagon until we start winning.
     
  15. ibleedgreen7476

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    1
    I have the pro football weekly and its retarded. In the same magazine that gives the

    Patriots (13-3)
    Dolphins (9-7)
    Bills (7-9)
    Jets (7-9)

    Also gives these Super Bowl Odds

    Pats 3-1
    Jets 18-1
    Fins' 22-1
    Bills 40-1

    that makes a ton of sense right, fuck them.
     
  16. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    51,932
    Likes Received:
    23,637
    I like to spell it Pro Football Weakly.
     
  17. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    but thats what you have to expect out of PFW or PFT(Talk).

    they are just retarded publications.
     
  18. Kris 15

    Kris 15 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    16,735
    Likes Received:
    1,499
    New HC, new QB ... yeah.
     
  19. benjetin

    benjetin New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Messages:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    I see 7-9 as a ok year as long as we play hard and win like the last 6 or 7 in a row.
     
  20. Mr Electric

    Mr Electric Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    18,362
    Likes Received:
    1
    So you want the team to start off 1-8 or 0-9? Sounds like an okay year...
     
    #20 Mr Electric, Jun 15, 2009
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2009
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page