How to build a great football team

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by xxedge72x, Apr 20, 2009.

  1. xxedge72x

    xxedge72x 2018 Gang Green QB Guru Award Winner

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    12,286
    Likes Received:
    3,954
    With a new coach that appears to have tons of potential, I'm hoping the Jets
    FO treats the draft and future offseasons as opportunities to get back to building football teams the right way. This weekend could be an excellent beginning to all that.

    Going back in time, one of the better coaches in the team's history, Walt Michaels, had it right with his draft philosophy. Let me give some examples of what Walt did with his drafts:

    1977
    New York Jets Draft 1977
    Round (pick) Player Position College
    1 (#4) Powell, Marvin OT USC
    2 (#33) Walker, Wesley WR California
    4 (#90) Dierking, Scott RB Purdue
    6 (#144) Klecko, Joe DT Temple


    1978
    New York Jets Draft 1978
    Round (pick) Player Position College
    1 (#4) Ward, Chris OT Ohio State
    3 (#61) Shuler, Mickey TE Penn State


    1979
    New York Jets Draft 1979
    Round (pick) Player Position College
    1 (#14) Lyons, Marty DE Alabama
    2 (#41) Gastineau, Mark DE East Central (OK)

    Like all drafts, his drafts were spattered with bad picks, but among those bad picks, Walt did the most important thing... which was to address the trenches.

    The Jets have a good o-line and an above average d-line right now... but there is absolutely no depth, and no youth at these positions outside of Mangold and Ferguson.

    You can't solve any problem overnight... but if Rex hopes to build a team as serious as he appears to be... then the lines need to be a priority each and every draft.

    Hope we have a great draft this weekend!
     
    #1 xxedge72x, Apr 20, 2009
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2009
  2. Turnbub

    Turnbub New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2002
    Messages:
    978
    Likes Received:
    0
    Agree that lines need help (depth at very least) and everything starts w/good line play.

    D-Line: not comfortable with DE's. Ellis is 32 and isn't getting younger. Kenyon Coleman is good but think the jets could get better at the position and hope the DE position is addressed in first 3 rounds.

    O-Line depth will be a Day 2 issue i believe. saw a note that callahan has been down at univ. of maryland working guys out (don't ask for link cause i don't remember where i saw that)
     
  3. BlairThomas#1

    BlairThomas#1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,252
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't understand some of the opinions on Ellis over the past few years. He played well in the 4-3 until Herm's last year and then he's been very good in the 3-4 including a spectacular year last year.

    To me, Ellis is/has been the definition of an anchor on the defensive line. In addition,he has been versatile throughout his career playing DE in the 4-3 and 3-4 and even spending some time at OLB in the 3-4.
     
  4. BadgerOnLSD

    BadgerOnLSD Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    15,188
    Likes Received:
    3
    I'd like to see us address OL/DL depth in the 2nd and 3rd rounds.
     
  5. gustoonarmy

    gustoonarmy 2006-2007 TGG.com Best International Poster of the

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,174
    Likes Received:
    160
    Especially !!
    Also, Fanaca isn't getting any younger
     
  6. BomberJet

    BomberJet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2002
    Messages:
    2,113
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    At the age of 32, this anchor is sinking fast. Jets can't over look this fact....the older you get the more prone you are to having that 'down-hill' year, veteran players tend to get.
     
  7. alleycat9

    alleycat9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    8,945
    Likes Received:
    1,787
    the problem is that people on this site continue to not understand what a 3-4 de does. they have no concept of the position. its not a high sack position, its not a high tackle position, its not a high profile position. its basically a dt who takes up blockers just like the ng does. most if not all of the good des in the 3-4 were dts in college. almost none of them were the high profile rush type 4-3 des. but around here everybody wants ellis to be a big time 4-3 de who has 15 sacks a year. they simply fail to understand the position.

    i have always given this kid credit as he has been jerked around more by this team than anyone i can remember. he dealt with it at least 2 years if not 3 with the sperm, he has dealt with the move to a 3-4... and he does nothing but continue to play and do a pretty good job. fact is 3-4 des usually dont go to the probowl. but their lbs do.
     
  8. KSJets

    KSJets New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2003
    Messages:
    2,504
    Likes Received:
    0
    People also forget that Ellis was drafted to play 3-4 DE by Parcells/Groh and did pretty well his rookie season as well.
     
  9. alleycat9

    alleycat9 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2002
    Messages:
    8,945
    Likes Received:
    1,787
    very true i forgot that!

    to play devils advocate, those guys never won a championship, but once upon a time we drafted this guy who did lead us to a championship and he didnt have anything to do with any kind of line... that would be joe namath.... i guess it works both ways. and sometimes you just have to get lucky like we did drafting klecko in the 6th and gastineau out of wherever he came from :)
     
  10. matt robinson 17

    matt robinson 17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,158
    Likes Received:
    8,027
    All good picks except fpr Mark Merrill, he was a stiff...
     
  11. BlairThomas#1

    BlairThomas#1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,252
    Likes Received:
    0
    I not saying that Ellis is going to play forever, but considering the year he had last season a major drop-off in the next two seasons isn't all that likely.

    I'd be interesting to see a study about 4-3 vs. 3-4 DEs. It would seem to me that 3-4 DEs would have more longevity because they are generally in on less tackles and usually aren't getting blindsided by RBs when they go after the QB. Basically they just have to occupy blockers and aren't changing direction all that much.
     
    #11 BlairThomas#1, Apr 20, 2009
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2009
  12. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    THe last regime did a good job in the draft.
     
  13. mj2sexay

    mj2sexay Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,619
    Likes Received:
    8
    A main problem with Herm was not only the neglect of replenishing the offensive line with developing young talent, but also keeping the talent they had. Randy Thomas could've been kept. Kareem just wanted out. Nothing they can do there. But at no time did they really develop a young offensive line, and it was priority number 1 when Mangini got here.

    That being said I hope Tannenbaum doesn't forget the valuable lesson learned. Drafting and developing offensive line talent in the early to mid rounds is extremely important to increase the depth and cohesiveness of an offensive line. Faneca is getting older. Woody is getting older and there's no depth behind him. Moore Ferguson and Mangold are a solid foundation, and all are locked in at least for next year. So in my opinion the offensive line depth is something that can be addressed in the later rounds.

    On the defensive side of the ball if we come away in the first round with a Tyson Jackson in the first or a trade down and Gilbert in the late first or Brace in the second, I'll be in agreement with the philosophy. This d line needs young talent NOW. Ellis really had an underrated year but he's 32. Coleman is serviceable and Jenkins is a force but needs to be spelled by someone not named Sione Pouha.
     
  14. BlairThomas#1

    BlairThomas#1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,252
    Likes Received:
    0
    The last regime as in Bradway / Herm?

    There are only TWO players that are still on the team from the 2001 - 2005 drafts which Bradway / Herm were responsible for, and one of them is Bryan Thomas. (Sure players went to other teams, but that doesn't mean that they drafted well for the Jets.)

    In fact, Shaun Ellis, Bryan Thomas and Kerry Rhodes are the only Jets drafted from 2000 - 2005 still on the team. Overall, only 20 or so players on the active roster were drafted by the Jets.
     
  15. Jake

    Jake Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2004
    Messages:
    15,749
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    No I meant Mangini's regime. I guess I didnt realize Tannenbaum is still here. Whatever.
     
  16. BlairThomas#1

    BlairThomas#1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,252
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry, man. Wasn't trying to be a jerk. I just was shocked when I looked at the results of the Bradway drafts.
     
  17. KJet84

    KJet84 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2006
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    1
    Dont forget that we picked up Douglas from Bmore...hes not that young but hes good depth and can spell Coleman or even start.
     
  18. NDmick

    NDmick Revis Christ

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    22,432
    Likes Received:
    3
    yeah almost all of them arent here anymore... its bad, really bad.
     
  19. afternoondelight

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    302
    Likes Received:
    1
    every draft should have some oline/dline depth............it all starts at the trenches
     
  20. Murrell2878

    Murrell2878 Lets go JETS!
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Messages:
    24,459
    Likes Received:
    858
    Good stuff edge. Walt should have never been let go after the 82 season.
     

Share This Page