Jets interested in Cutler. ALL CUTLER THINGS GO HERE, UNTIL THERE'S ACTUAL NEWS

Discussion in 'New York Jets' started by sunnygs97, Mar 19, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MikeSLTJ23

    MikeSLTJ23 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    3,272
    Likes Received:
    272
    I was there, and Cutler had nothing to do with that. You can attribute that game to our porous run D that day giving up over 100 yards to Peyton Hillis.
     
  2. Acad23

    Acad23 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Messages:
    26,520
    Likes Received:
    20,975
    34-17...I remember, it was ugly.
     
  3. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    Did you watch the game? Cutler tore our secondary up in the shitty windy rainy weather.
     
  4. MikeSLTJ23

    MikeSLTJ23 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    3,272
    Likes Received:
    272
    Yes, that's why I said I was there, and I sat through the whole game in the driving rain. Cutler didn't win that game. Peyton Hillis did. And the refs for that matter between the Eddie Royal TD and the early play that gladly I can't even remember what happened, just remembered it was ridiculous. He threw the ball great, but Peyton Hillis was the one that consistently kept drives going there.
     
  5. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    I was there too - two seasons in a row the only game I went to was the same awful weather. There running game was surely a factor but to say Cutler had nothing to do with the win is ridiculous. He threw for almost 400 yards on us.

    Imagine what he could do with a running game that showed up every week ...
     
  6. doug4563

    doug4563 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2004
    Messages:
    278
    Likes Received:
    29
    Hey quick question, for you guys since I haven't seen it posted anywhere...I think the Jets should go after this QB named Jay Cutler. Where can I post my opinion?
     
  7. Gubernaculum

    Gubernaculum New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    2,342
    Likes Received:
    0
    Tannenbaum is hopefully talking to Denver right now to get this thing hammered out.

    Jets + Cutler = crazy delicious
     
  8. Green Lantern

    Green Lantern Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,044
    Likes Received:
    2
    The Jets are interested in Cutler.
    Green Lantern's interested in winning lottery numbers.
    Same quality news.
     
  9. week17magic

    week17magic New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2008
    Messages:
    208
    Likes Received:
    0
    Cutler will be in his peak within the next two seasons
     
  10. JetsFan

    JetsFan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2002
    Messages:
    6,287
    Likes Received:
    691
    Let me break down the difference between denver vs the jets if we were to face each other with the currents rosters.

    They would stack eight in the box and dare our QB (which ever one) to throw the ball.

    On offense they would spread out their recievers creating miss-matches and give Cutler more targets. This preventing us from stacking even seven in the box and giving them better lanes to run in.

    We would blitz which would create more one on one coverages and give Cutler all kinds of targets. While on offense we would run run run and dink and dunk all game struggling for a 1st down.

    A strong accurate QB will open up the run, a sub-par QB like Kellen will allow a defense to stack the front to stop the run.

    With Kellen who throws twice the INT rate as TDs and scrambles before he even checks down to the third reciever, every team would blitz us and stack the line. You all say we had a bad OL two years ago, I say the line would not have mattered.

    Send Kellen to the Browns with Mangini.

    The only good thing about Kellen is he has finally shut up and realized he will never be our QB of the future.

    Enough ranting, just get Cutler. If not him then either Anderson or Quinn.
     
  11. GBA

    GBA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,690
    Likes Received:
    126
    That's.. terrible. I can't even imagine what makes you to think Clemens would limit our offense to dinks and dunks. For all his perceived faults, arm strength definitely one of them.. accuracy probably isn't either, but only time will tell. Also, the OL makes a huge difference.. to argue the contrary is just absurd. Lastly, KC has kept pretty quiet during his tenure here, so I'm not sure how you figure 'he finally shut up'.

    BTW, Anderson is a bum. Taking into account his contract and the fact that all three of the QBs on our roster are probably better options, trading for him would be a huge mistake.
     
    #491 GBA, Mar 25, 2009
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2009
  12. DHarris52

    DHarris52 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2009
    Messages:
    906
    Likes Received:
    33

    Dude, did you have a few too many at this game?

    Cutler threw for 357 yards and 2 TD's in weather that typically limits a game to the ground. In the Meadowlands no less. That's an impressive feat.
     
  13. abyzmul

    abyzmul R.J. MacReady, 21018 Funniest Member Award Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    52,348
    Likes Received:
    24,111
    I don't know, man, Hillis was a beast against us when we played Denver, I think he would be the perfect compliment to our existing team of Jones and Washington. We have lacked a true short-yardage power back for quite a while.
     
  14. ........

    ........ Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree. I think he's going to be great, I just think he commands more value in a trade right now than Torain does. I'd love to see either one of them in green.

    I should also mention, he's exactly the kind of guy I wanted when I hoped the Jets would draft Owen Schmitt, but that didn't happen.
     
    #494 ........, Mar 25, 2009
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2009
  15. ........

    ........ Trolls

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Because people only judge him on his time in 07 when he was running an offense based largely on the dink and the dunk.
     
  16. BadgerOnLSD

    BadgerOnLSD Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    15,188
    Likes Received:
    3
    If only we displayed any pass rush at all in that game... his receivers wouldn't have had 7-8 seconds each play to get open.
     
  17. GBA

    GBA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2007
    Messages:
    2,690
    Likes Received:
    126
    If it weren't for a couple horribly blown coverages/missed tackles, Cutler's numbers would have been pedestrian. He was missing open targets all over the place throughout most of the game.
     
  18. WhiteShoeWillis

    WhiteShoeWillis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    19,492
    Likes Received:
    41
    Now we're going to make excuses as to why Cutler lit up the Jets. The original premise was that he had nothing to do with the victory, now it's but but the Jets secondary sucked. But the Jets had no pass rush. But the Jets missed tackles. Why stop there? Go ahead and make excuses for the rest of the numbers he put up in '08 too.

    But nothing, he lit up the Jets that day, end of story.
     
  19. MikeSLTJ23

    MikeSLTJ23 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    3,272
    Likes Received:
    272
    I did have a few too many, but not arguing the #'s here. Arguing about how the game unfolded. Peyton Hillis completely demoralized our defense. Take away the nonsense Eddie Royal (was it about 60 yards?) TD and those #'s are starting to look a little more pedestrian. 1 TD is hardly winning that game for him.

    He looked good out there, but he didn't win that game. Peyton Hillis absolutely destroyed our run D. He got 5 yard gain after 5 yard gain and it demoralized our team. Cutler merely put the hurt on us later in the game if I remember correctly. He gathered the yards, 60 of which came very early when Royal (I thought clearly) stepped out of bounds, but they called it a TD anyway. So take that play out of it, and you're talking still solid yardage and 1 TD and 1 pick. A very good game for that weather, but regardless, all I'm saying is you cannot attribute that win to Cutler. No one should look back at that game and say Cutler won it. Now that the Jets are after him, it seems everyone is praising him for being the lone bright spot on Denver and elevating that team to where they're at. People have to try to look at his body of work objectively and as soon as they hear "Cutler to the Jets" they put on those green glasses. He's a very good QB, but I'm just saying, we fell for this trap before, even if it was for a much older player. Don't get sucked in by the big name.

    Don't throw away a ton of picks on a player that might not be worth it. If the Jets CS really do like what they have on this team (and I have to assume that they do because this isn't the secret society that Mangini brought in where everything was a lie), then let's see what we have in Clemens and Ratliff and use those picks to shore up other areas. A QB is just one piece of the puzzle...if we can get a # of other players in the draft that just make our QBs better, than that's what we need to do. Go out and get some OL, a bruising RB, a tall WR. Get these pieces in place, and the QB will have the time to throw and the talent to throw to.
     
  20. Italian Seafood

    Italian Seafood New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    12,545
    Likes Received:
    3
    So did Tyler Thigpen, Seneca Wallace and the dude from the 49ers, whoever that was, among others, including Chad. Are we going to trade a ton of value for them?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page