Explain why it's okay for you to call LTJF a racist. I don't see a single racist thing in the post you quoted.
He never addressed the issue of McCain-Kennedy. He is selective in his responses and hate filled, definitely prejudiced, maybe not racist.
But his son's gay lover has or daughter's lesbian lover should be a person of color as well. You know that he would disown them.
One of the reasons the Republicans lost is because they didn't address issues like illegal immigration because of the McCain bill. I don't respond to every single post here. In fact I didn't plan on responding to any. McCain was not my choice. He's far too liberal a Republican for my likes. I just happen to think he would have been better than Obama. I think the Republicans learned their lesson and next time will provide a better candidate. Ooooh, someone criticizes Obama and he's hate filled and prejudice. You guys are really a piece of work. Tell me oh wise one, what is it exactly you like about Obama? Let's see if you can actually come up with an intelligent response that you don't copy and paste from the internet. Or are you just going to walk around and pronounce yourself cool because you voted for a black person and gay rights.
You said Obama was going to screw over Israel...Emanuel as Chief of Staff doesn't seem to point in that direction, does it?
I thought of this my whole lunch hour. Your logic here is flawed. There is no way to totally stop racism. There will always be extremists in society but I think this election proved that the "core" of America is not racist. By saying "even if there is one" you are setting an unachievable goal here to use for your argument. I agree that all racism should be eliminated but I do not agree that using racism in the form of affirmative action is the right way to go about it.
I watched all of the debates on both sides during the primaries. From the debates the only viable candidate other than McCain seemed to be Romney. Now I could be wrong but I don't think Mit Romney had or will every have a shot to be the Republican nominee because he is a Mormon and the evangelical wing of the Republican Party will never vote for what they percieve as a Cult member.
It really doesn't matter who is Chief of Staff. What matters is the process you are going to use to decide policy. If you're going to try and get consensus among allies on every move, that is not going to be good for Israel regardless of who is on your staff.
Because polygamy is highly misogynistic and leads to a taken advantage of and emotionally battered woman? Still, there is no correlation between gay marriage and polygamy.
I think you mean "bad for Israel" there. I imagine Obama would consult his Chief of Staff on most decisions...I think it makes a difference.
I had the same feeling. It seemed as if the GOP had nobody out there to run. Even McCain was problematic given his age, his flip flops, his temperament. This is not a man well loved in his party. Yet he got the nomination as all the others fell by the wayside.
