I think its gotta be done. This guy just has no clue what the hell to do. I'll even buy him the one way bus ticket outta Port Authority.
You think Sutton had anything to do with 56 points???? He is called the DEFENSIVE coordinator....as in the guy more responsible for the 35 points against us...... Anyway, we don't know who is responsible for these 3 man rushes for the whole second half....it could have been Mangini wanting our secondary to prove they can cover and getting the d-line to prove they can get pressure without blitzing... If it wasn't Sutton's call all half, you don't just fire him. Either way, the D needed to perform better....I think the defensive approach should have been the exact same as in the first half....
What in the world does the OFFENSE putting up 56 points have to do with our horrible DEFENSIVE Coordinator. And, yes, he should be fired. Hopefully, more people will finally come around to this notion.
4 forced fumbles, 3 recovered - 3 interceptions, 4 sacks and 0 points allowed in the first half. That doesnt equal firing. Warner just picked apart our d in the second half. When we blitzed they picked it up well and when we didnt warner threw some great passes. This was not Suttons fault.
Jets points INT for a TD. Fumble recovered on the AZ 40, Fumble recovered on the AZ 12, Fumble recovered on the AZ 29. I think the D had a lot to do with us scoring 56 points.
Im not blaming sutton anymore, at what point does eric mangini take over.. This is both thier defense and they share the blame... get rid of them both
Unfuckingbelievable. Do you think we score 56 points without that D today? 3 picks, 4 fumbles, sacks ... wowie
Lowery making a hit on Boldin so he fumbles, and Jenkins blocking a FG didn't occur because Bob Sutton drew it up that way. I don't know if it's the players or Mangini or Sutton, but this game became closer than it should have been. And what I do know is that I've been complaining of a vanilla Defense - especially, especially with the lead - for like 3 years now. So what's the common denominator? Sutton? Mangini?
Thank you WB. We won by 21, against arguably the best receivers in the league not named Owens or Moss.
i thought after watching the fist half that sutton had finally gotten it together. but for some reason he started the second half in a prevent defense. playing that way the players all pretty much just turn it off and start going through the motions. you have to continue to play until at least the 4th quarter even with that lead. once you ave the players shut it down its hard to get them back up to make some plays. just a poor decision to get conservative on d so early.
I think that our D has talent and talent makes plays. Boob Sutton, however, did not plan for all that to happen, and his schemems and "strategy" ( and I use that term lightly) is the problem.
This is totally uncalled for. Having travelled from the port authority recently the place is a zoo, especially on a Sunday. A cab to the Staten Island Ferry which is excellent by the way would be more appropriate depending where you intend sending this clown.
I want to join the fire SUTTON club ASAP! The man is a waste of out DEFENSIVE talent and POUHA is a joke! When JENKINS is out our defense is non-existent! DREW COLEMAN is a joke too!
OK - so it's the players that make plays but when they get toasted it's all on the DC? There has to be some middle ground there. I don't even like sutton, but the D played a huge part in 56 points today.
Look, when Revis made the pick-6, maybe maybe, that was a good decision to drop 9 into coverage and rush 2; maybe Sutton made a good call there. When Lowery forced a fumble, it had nothing to do with Sutton. When the Cardinals came back in the second half, the players played a major part in allowing that to happen. However, the players were also following a scheme, a conservative scheme that sucked and an all too familiar one that has chronically allowed teams back in games for 3 seasons now.
