If it matters to anyone, Bernie was not and is not a member of the Democratic Party. Not saying that makes it right, just saying.
This is old news, the courts have already said the DNC had every right to rig it for the candidate of their choice. DNC lawyers argued they had every right to choose the candidate they wanted and the courts agreed. On August 25, 2017, Federal Judge William Zloch, dismissed the lawsuit after several months of litigation during which DNC attorneys argued that the DNC would be well within their rights to select their own candidate. “In evaluating Plaintiffs’ claims at this stage, the Court assumes their allegations are true—that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Clinton and sought to propel her ahead of her Democratic opponent,” the court order dismissing the lawsuit stated.
yup. all the more reason for third parties to be allowed in the debates. the two parties are shit and have too much power.
Yeah, it's hardly news. Also zero surprise that the lawsuit went nowhere. They really need to shitcan the super delegate nonsense. How do we make that happen? Anyone? It was created because of the Ted Kennedy/Jimmy Carter mess, but really all it is is influence peddling for a more more "elite" candidate. I may have voted for Bernie depending on my mood which scenario I thought was funnier on election day, but man, Sanders really got tooled. And he knew he got tooled, he was just way too gracious about it and refused to give Trump more of an opportunity to get in. If he didn't do the "POLITICALLY CORRECT THING" and not throw his support behind Clinton in an effort to prevent anyone but Trump getting into office, Clinton would still have lost, but probably the popular vote - by a decent margin - as well. Bernie supporters were so pissed, they probably would've pulled a voted for Nader/took votes from Gore. My guess would be Jill Stein.
Old News? LMAO FOH..seriously. It was considered "Hearsay" Now 2 ...you know what. Fuk it. I'm not going to even bother.. Not worth my time.
I posted a thread about it back in August http://theganggreen.com/forums/thre...ir-right-to-rig-primaries.88896/#post-3592499 DNC lawyers actually argued that it was their right to rig it
The problem with Communism and Socialism is that in the end, no-one wants to give up their own personal TVs and their own personal cell phones so everyone else can have a TV and a cell phone. Wait, that already happened. If it came to distributing your own personal wealth? Haha, no-one - and I mean NO-ONE - would do it. Communism just doesn't work, and killed millions of people. Imperialism has killed millions of people. Capitalism is busted, but Michael Milken has probably done more for the poor than that horrid bridge troll, Mother Teresa. So sometimes you have to make Pyrrhic choices.
It's a very interesting take. Milken is a total hump, but as far as helping the poor? I'm not wrong on Mother Teresa or Milken. Her main aim in India was to convert starving kids to Catholicism, the rest was secondary. Milken, pond scum that he is, probably fed more people in India than she ever did - and her accounting skills weren't stellar. The old man is half Albanian and rolled his eyes when Mother Teresa got canonized. Don't ever talk to Bill Donohue, though. He'll probably pray to St. Mother Teresa to strike you dead or some shit. He's a total tard. God made him that way.
Wait a minute, isn't this the smelly pirate hooker that got fired from CNN for leaking debate questions to Hillary? Lmao
Yes...THAT'S Old news...I was talking about the people who were coming forward to confirm it which had NEVER HAPPENED before...
Dierking, I think I found the milken/mother theresa source: https://www.forbes.com/forbes/2004/0202/036.html .