http://www.canadafreepress.com/inde...8bcab95dd1-Call_to_Champions&utm_medium=email There's no way this shit is real, right? I'm not a conspiracy theorist at all, but I read this and it literally scared the shit out of me. Someone please just tell me this guy is a nut job banging a cookoo drum. If anyone can speak to the reputation of this site and author, please do.
part 3 .......... http://www.canadafreepress.com/inde...8bcab95dd1-Call_to_Champions&utm_medium=email
lol - never heard of it to be honest, so if it's a known full of shit site just let me know. I read that shit and it scared me. I don't usually buy crap like this.
"Now listen to what I am telling you. This is a continuing operation that involves many of the same people on both sides of the aisle in Washington. This is one of the reasons why no one wants to talk about Obama’s past. He is the product of a continuing intelligence operation, put in power to oversee the dismantling of the U.S., with the economy being the lynchpin of our destruction. Obama, Jarrett, and the Clintons are in constant contact with all high level operatives inside the DHS. Perhaps not directly in all cases but through their contacts. They are working together to see to it that the U.S. economy is brought down, robbing the people of their wealth and then blaming partisan politics for the crash." Credibility ruined.
It's total BS. All federal agencies have to be non-partisan because they're spending federal funds. DHS would never title a working group "xxx for Obama" they'd call it the "xxx for the Executive" or something similar. It's just somebody having some fun with a fictional idea. Also, remember that there are many people inside DHS who were put there during the Bush Administration. It'd be really hard to have a partisan conspiracy designed to do anything over any period of time.
I had to skim this, but it strikes me that you'd have to think that Barack Obama was some sort of evil genius to pull it off, and I really don't think he's very smart. You'd also have to believe that thousands of unemployed kids with iMacs are able to get out of bed and accomplish something semi-productive each day. I have too much faith in the greedy powers of the market to think that it would allow someone like that to sit at home all day playing on the internet. I also have too much faith in the power of internet pornography to think that they wouldn't get more than 15-20 devious minutes into the job before they'd have to surf around, beat off and then call Dominoes and charge bad pizza to their EBT cards. Asking the most unreliable group in society to somehow have purpose and reliability is just not believable.
I work in information security so maybe I can help with the hacking part... though I'm not involved with government agencies so honestly I don't know how their cyber security divisions operate. The part about gathering users forum information and then finding out who they really are... they would require access to the user's IP address, and then access to the Internet Service Provider in order to determine the owner of the IP address. I don't know whether or not this is happening. From a privacy standpoint ISPs should not be disclosing this information to government, certainly not to covert operations. There is the possibility that the ISPs themselves are compromised but to be honest I doubt it. Think about it, any sane person takes ANYTHING found on a message board with a massive grain of salt. Anything. People on this board could claim to be human... you need to be at least somewhat skeptical. Second, the amount of work involved in getting together such a skilled covert team that actually remains a secret does not come close to the value obtained from going after people on message boards. If they really wanted to do the above process, they wouldn't need secret hacker teams to do it. As for discrediting people on message boards... they're called trolls. Every site has them. Politics has them more. Big whoop. I stopped reading this around the second post. The whole thing smells like tin foil hat bullshit to me. Fear sells. The major news outlets know that, and so do the small time hacks who want to be making Rush Limbaugh type money.
I don't buy the premise of the original post at all but it's a fact that the government sends out letters to ISP's every day looking for exactly the kind of info you're talking about. The letters are accompanied by a stern warning about the penalties associated with acknowledging the letter's existence or in any way informing the target in question that they've been snooped. The government also routinely tells associates of targets of investigations that they interview that they are liable to prosecution if the target finds out from them that they're being investigated. The really chilling effect is that people who consult lawyers after that type of interview often refrain from further communications with the target involved for years, even if they're a relative, because there's too much risk that the interviewee will be prosecuted if the the target discovers they are being investigated. The government also uses online resources to further investigations, up to and including planting false or uncorroborated information online to see if it draws flies or other leads and tips, frequently uncorroborated also. The US government is less democratic and more secretive about its affairs than at any time since WWII. The primary culprit is the Patriot Act, which should have been over-turned by the courts but has instead been renewed by congress and signed by two consecutive Presidents.
Maybe these were the ones who hacked into South Carolina and got anyone who electronically filed ss number,bank account etc
Heh. Harvard Law School. Editor of law review. Law Professor. Elected twice to US President, kicking the shit out of your buddies. I wonder how smart you are saying things like that. Well, not really.
