I don't like Drafting Linemen up high but....#77=Beast!

Royal Tee · 01-01-2008, 12:18 PM

..Myself along with a few other JETS fans like the Idea of drafting Jake Long and Moving D'Brick.

If we don't I won't be upset unless D'Brick continues his BS and gets our QB Killed and we make no attempts at suring up our O-Line.

All i'm asking is that you watch the Michigan game today and watch big ol #77.
They'll run behind him constantly and he delivers....
Truly a Beast.

afa using another pick on an O-Linemen think...Cowboys + O-Line = Emmit's career.

Go BLUE!

-MC- · 01-01-2008, 12:21 PM

Hes a junior correct? Not sure if hell declare. But if he does hes going to light up the combine. 50 bench reps maybe?

boogerstyles · 01-01-2008, 12:29 PM

Would he even drop to 6? Doubtful... but i'd be for taking him if he does...

DeathByJets · 01-01-2008, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -MC-

Hes a junior correct? Not sure if hell declare. But if he does hes going to light up the combine. 50 bench reps maybe?

He's a senior. Top OT in the draft.

rillo · 01-01-2008, 12:35 PM

Honestly, I wouldn't mind it...but i rather draft defense. Lets see what we do with free agency.

GreenHornet · 01-01-2008, 12:37 PM

As others have noted, he is a senior and yes, is the top OT in the draft. I don't think he will be there at #6, but you never know.

The only thing additional is, I really think the Front Office will address our offensive line quickly in the FA market. I do not think they will risk it being sub-par for next year.

Banking on Jake Long being there at #6, is risky from the standpoint of, it would mean that our offensive line isn't quite fixed yet. After this season, that is a hell of a gamble.

JetsLookingforDWare · 01-01-2008, 12:46 PM

1. Theres no chance in hell we're moving D'Brick.

2. Its highly unlikely we spend another top 10 pick on OL.

3. Jake Long would be a much better RT than D'Brick.

4. We need a good G next to D'Brick, not to move him, draft someone else very high, and call him a bust.

5. D'Brick isn't even a bust. He has a good game, few people mention it. He has a bad game...and suddenly it's time to dump him...he's a bust...whine whine whine.

sackexchange · 01-01-2008, 12:52 PM

Long does indeed look like an elite OT. If he is there at 6, I think the Jets have to consider it. Don't think he will be though. Should be gone in the top 4 picks.

RobA · 01-01-2008, 12:53 PM

No, no more drafting Top 10 lineman. Use FA to solve all our o-line problems.

HardHitta · 01-01-2008, 12:56 PM

He wont fall to us anyway.

Royal Tee · 01-01-2008, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RobA

No, no more drafting Top 10 lineman. Use FA to solve all our o-line problems.

Which has always been my position. Build the O-Line via FA & Lower picks....
....unless there is a franchise LT Available and I believe Long to be that.

Most likely he won't be there true and I love the mentality of some blaming the lack of a Guard for D'Brick sucking at times....

Also just for the record, I have been hard on D'Brick but I have yet to ever call him a bust.........yet.

JetsIn2004 · 01-01-2008, 01:14 PM

Look, Ferguson is ILL SUITED for RT. RT needs to be a mauler.. he's not.

desert swordz · 01-01-2008, 01:15 PM

when they played each other, vernon gholston tore jake long's ass up

NDmick · 01-01-2008, 01:20 PM

which is why i'd take him over long any day. we'll pick him 6th overall

Royal Tee · 01-01-2008, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmiller07

when they played each other, vernon gholston tore jake long's ass up

If I remember correctly 2 of his sacks came from the opposite side and other than that he really didn't light up the box score.

-MC- · 01-01-2008, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royal Tee

If I remember correctly 2 of his sacks came from the opposite side and other than that he really didn't light up the box score.

Nah, I remember he got him pretty good a couple times. Didnt necessarily tear him up though.

ess-dog · 01-01-2008, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeathByJets

He's a senior. Top OT in the draft.

...and he's not falling past 4

PennyandtheJets · 01-01-2008, 03:06 PM

Trade Brick? That is among the dumbest things I have ever read on this board...

And Jake Long has almost no chance of being there when we pick...

DraftaFullBack · 01-01-2008, 03:21 PM

If Jake Long is there KC will not pass on him, I'd bet my house on it.

Also, where the hell can you move Dbrick?

jasonjets · 01-01-2008, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royal Tee

If I remember correctly 2 of his sacks came from the opposite side and other than that he really didn't light up the box score.

To view links in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. Your post count is 0 momentarily.

I believe this clip was from 2006 when Gholston was a sophmore and Long was a junior. Wow!

01-01-2008, 12:18 PM	#1
Royal Tee Girls juss wanna have fun Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Mixin and Makin Music! Posts: 16,987 vCash: 3000	I don't like Drafting Linemen up high but....#77=Beast! ..Myself along with a few other JETS fans like the Idea of drafting Jake Long and Moving D'Brick. If we don't I won't be upset unless D'Brick continues his BS and gets our QB Killed and we make no attempts at suring up our O-Line. All i'm asking is that you watch the Michigan game today and watch big ol #77. They'll run behind him constantly and he delivers.... Truly a Beast. afa using another pick on an O-Linemen think...Cowboys + O-Line = Emmit's career. Go BLUE! __________________ theRoyal1.com the NY JETS Defense - "Snappy and Reponkinslive!!"

01-01-2008, 12:21 PM	#2
-MC- Totally Addicted Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Syracuse, NY Posts: 2,241 vCash: 2000	Hes a junior correct? Not sure if hell declare. But if he does hes going to light up the combine. 50 bench reps maybe? __________________

01-01-2008, 12:35 PM	#5
rillo Totally Addicted Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: West Palm Beach, via Brooklyn! Posts: 2,531 vCash: 2050	Honestly, I wouldn't mind it...but i rather draft defense. Lets see what we do with free agency. __________________

01-01-2008, 12:53 PM	#9
RobA 2005-2007 TGG.com Most Optimistic Award Winner Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Pequannock, NJ Posts: 8,249 vCash: 2000	No, no more drafting Top 10 lineman. Use FA to solve all our o-line problems. __________________ 2 Years, 2 Title Games, Same Result, SAME OLD JETS

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

01-01-2008, 12:29 PM	#3
boogerstyles TheGangGreen.com Fanatic Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: BKNY Posts: 764 vCash: 2000	Would he even drop to 6? Doubtful... but i'd be for taking him if he does...

01-01-2008, 12:37 PM	#6
GreenHornet Totally Addicted Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Ganggreenboro, NJ Posts: 7,382 vCash: 75	As others have noted, he is a senior and yes, is the top OT in the draft. I don't think he will be there at #6, but you never know. The only thing additional is, I really think the Front Office will address our offensive line quickly in the FA market. I do not think they will risk it being sub-par for next year. Banking on Jake Long being there at #6, is risky from the standpoint of, it would mean that our offensive line isn't quite fixed yet. After this season, that is a hell of a gamble.

01-01-2008, 12:46 PM	#7
JetsLookingforDWare Banned Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 5,553 vCash: 2000	1. Theres no chance in hell we're moving D'Brick. 2. Its highly unlikely we spend another top 10 pick on OL. 3. Jake Long would be a much better RT than D'Brick. 4. We need a good G next to D'Brick, not to move him, draft someone else very high, and call him a bust. 5. D'Brick isn't even a bust. He has a good game, few people mention it. He has a bad game...and suddenly it's time to dump him...he's a bust...whine whine whine.

01-01-2008, 12:52 PM	#8
sackexchange Totally Addicted Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Mansfield, MA Posts: 4,356 vCash: 2000	Long does indeed look like an elite OT. If he is there at 6, I think the Jets have to consider it. Don't think he will be though. Should be gone in the top 4 picks.

01-01-2008, 12:56 PM	#10
HardHitta Totally Addicted Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Behind You With A Chainsaw... Posts: 5,563 vCash: 2000	He wont fall to us anyway.

01-01-2008, 01:14 PM	#12
JetsIn2004 Banned Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 11,913 vCash: 2000	Look, Ferguson is ILL SUITED for RT. RT needs to be a mauler.. he's not.

01-01-2008, 01:15 PM	#13
desert swordz Totally Addicted Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: depends Posts: 1,723 vCash: 2000	when they played each other, vernon gholston tore jake long's ass up

01-01-2008, 01:20 PM	#14
NDmick Revis Christ Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 22,484 vCash: 25	which is why i'd take him over long any day. we'll pick him 6th overall

01-01-2008, 03:06 PM	#18
PennyandtheJets Totally Addicted Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Maryland Posts: 10,305 vCash: 2000	Trade Brick? That is among the dumbest things I have ever read on this board... And Jake Long has almost no chance of being there when we pick...

01-01-2008, 03:21 PM	#19
DraftaFullBack Totally Addicted Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 1,119 vCash: 2000	If Jake Long is there KC will not pass on him, I'd bet my house on it. Also, where the hell can you move Dbrick?