Reply

Ranjensen

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-03-2006, 02:45 PM   #1
genom
Totally Addicted
 
genom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,196
vCash: 2000
Default Ranjensen

This guy must be suicidal. The jets are winning and this guy has nothing to complain about.
genom is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 02:48 PM   #2
FITM
2006 TGG.com Best Photoshop Artist Award Winner
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,550
vCash: 15152
Default

Chad threw 2 picks.

Run D is bad.

That's 2 things.
FITM is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 02:50 PM   #3
genom
Totally Addicted
 
genom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,196
vCash: 2000
Default

The jets were up by 30 when GB decided to start running the ball...........
genom is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 02:56 PM   #4
FITM
2006 TGG.com Best Photoshop Artist Award Winner
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,550
vCash: 15152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by genom View Post
The jets were up by 30 when GB decided to start running the ball...........
No excuse to stop playing aggressive defense.
FITM is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 03:15 PM   #5
abyzmul
Numchuck Sticks
 
abyzmul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hy-Brasil
Posts: 31,607
vCash: 25
Default

He's a troll, and he was apparently successful.
__________________
If you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you. - Bill Cosby

Most people are fools, most authority is malignant, God does not exist, and everything is wrong. - Ted Nelson
abyzmul is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 03:21 PM   #6
GreenMachine
KCCO
 
GreenMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Clermont, FL
Posts: 12,533
vCash: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FITM View Post
Chad threw 2 picks.

Run D is bad.

That's 2 things.
1...He is a Chad supporter. he says that the Jets are doing well because of Chad, and Chad makes Mangini look good.

2.. How many times did the Packers rush game hurt the Jets today?
GreenMachine is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 03:24 PM   #7
abyzmul
Numchuck Sticks
 
abyzmul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hy-Brasil
Posts: 31,607
vCash: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenMachine View Post
2.. How many times did the Packers rush game hurt the Jets today?
Ahman Green had 102 yards on 14 attempts. If we hadn't been running away with the score, their running game would have killed us.
__________________
If you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you. - Bill Cosby

Most people are fools, most authority is malignant, God does not exist, and everything is wrong. - Ted Nelson
abyzmul is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 03:32 PM   #8
genom
Totally Addicted
 
genom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,196
vCash: 2000
Default

We were playing off the line with less blitzes. There is no doubt in my mind that the packers get now where near that many rush yards if we're not up by 30.
genom is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 03:35 PM   #9
Namath2Kolber
Totally Addicted
 
Namath2Kolber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 3,984
vCash: 25
Default

The only bad things to take away from that game are:
(1) Nugent's kickoffs are weak
(2) J-Mac losing battles for the ball
(3) Punt returns need work
(4) Schlegel sucks

Otherwise, everything seems good.
__________________
Namath2Kolber is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 03:37 PM   #10
PJ4Ever
Totally Addicted
 
PJ4Ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,945
vCash: 2000
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEC315 ROW22 View Post
The only bad things to take away from that game are:
(1) Nugent's kickoffs are weak
(2) J-Mac losing battles for the ball
(3) Punt returns need work
(4) Schlegel sucks

Otherwise, everything seems good.
Keep in mind Nugent had the ball being held for him the whole game. Might affect it.

Don't agree with the J-Mac complaints, although I wanna see the plays again.

Punt returns have been bad all year, although that was a hell of a return by Poteat. Try him? Dwight hadn't done crap, now he's out anyway.

Schlegel made some bad plays but it's too early for that.
PJ4Ever is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 03:43 PM   #11
Kris 15
Totally Addicted
 
Kris 15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 14,538
vCash: 1251
Default

The Packers got their rushing yards the same way we did against Jacksonville. Combined with a couple of plays where Green got loose. Looks worse on paper than it actually was.
Kris 15 is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 03:44 PM   #12
hoobash
Totally Addicted
 
hoobash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,105
vCash: 25
Default

He is prob on a KC board bitching about herm. Lets be happy this idiothasnt been here
hoobash is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 03:44 PM   #13
jets&rushfan
TheGangGreen.com Fanatic
 
jets&rushfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 918
vCash: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ4Ever View Post
Keep in mind Nugent had the ball being held for him the whole game. Might affect it.

Don't agree with the J-Mac complaints, although I wanna see the plays again.

Punt returns have been bad all year, although that was a hell of a return by Poteat. Try him? Dwight hadn't done crap, now he's out anyway.

Schlegel made some bad plays but it's too early for that.
The mulligan goes to Schlegel and Nugent for the game today, for cold balls and a reach around
jets&rushfan is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 03:45 PM   #14
abyzmul
Numchuck Sticks
 
abyzmul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hy-Brasil
Posts: 31,607
vCash: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by genom View Post
We were playing off the line with less blitzes. There is no doubt in my mind that the packers get now where near that many rush yards if we're not up by 30.
Judging by what? The monster way we've been showing up against the run this year? Face it, if our gameplanning isn't able to overcome our weaknesses early on, we always give up huge chunks of ground yardage when it counts. The Packers took what we gave them early on and passed more than they ran, and we were able to take a big lead early. Teams won't (and haven't) always done it and that's when we end up having to rely on Chad. We didn't have to lean on him so heavily today and he was allowed to get into a rhythm after a slow start, and we ran away with it. We still have weaknesses and they will be exploited by well-coached teams at times.
__________________
If you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you. - Bill Cosby

Most people are fools, most authority is malignant, God does not exist, and everything is wrong. - Ted Nelson
abyzmul is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 03:50 PM   #15
IIMeanDeanII
Totally Addicted
 
IIMeanDeanII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ohio Jet Fan
Posts: 1,844
vCash: 800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abyzmul View Post
Judging by what? The monster way we've been showing up against the run this year? Face it, if our gameplanning isn't able to overcome our weaknesses early on, we always give up huge chunks of ground yardage when it counts. The Packers took what we gave them early on and passed more than they ran, and we were able to take a big lead early. Teams won't (and haven't) always done it and that's when we end up having to rely on Chad. We didn't have to lean on him so heavily today and he was allowed to get into a rhythm after a slow start, and we ran away with it. We still have weaknesses and they will be exploited by well-coached teams at times.
The D looked fine with the run in the 1st to me. I think when we give away mediocre chunks on the ground, all that does is eat clock for us. I dont think the D would've been as soft if we did not have a 30pt lead. I really dont. When we have a huge lead on our opponent, and still eat a ton of clock even when we dont have the ball, is impressive to me.
IIMeanDeanII is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 04:18 PM   #16
abyzmul
Numchuck Sticks
 
abyzmul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hy-Brasil
Posts: 31,607
vCash: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IIMeanDeanII View Post
The D looked fine with the run in the 1st to me. I think when we give away mediocre chunks on the ground, all that does is eat clock for us. I dont think the D would've been as soft if we did not have a 30pt lead. I really dont. When we have a huge lead on our opponent, and still eat a ton of clock even when we dont have the ball, is impressive to me.
I have to admit that the interior of the defense does look better in past weeks, but they are still not holding the gaps well enough and Vilma has been invisible. I don't think we're in the bottom third of the league as far as run defense anymore, but it is still the weakness of our defense. When you give up certain areas of the field and the opposing coordinator bites, it is less the efficiency of your players than the efficiency of your gameplan.
__________________
If you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you. - Bill Cosby

Most people are fools, most authority is malignant, God does not exist, and everything is wrong. - Ted Nelson
abyzmul is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 04:36 PM   #17
genom
Totally Addicted
 
genom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,196
vCash: 2000
Default

Correct me if i'm wrong, but aren't 3-4 ILB supposed to be more in the mold of a role player, while the 3-4 OLB get the sacks and the glory? I think Vilma's doing fine in the position, considering the fact that hes the defensive captain and does a great job in providing leadership and directions to the rest of the D.
genom is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 04:47 PM   #18
PRPitbull
Totally Addicted
 
PRPitbull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,106
vCash: 2000
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FITM View Post
Chad threw 2 picks.

Run D is bad.

That's 2 things.
a "W" is a "W", could care less about anything else.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadgerOnLSD
That should be our slogan -

TGG: Our morons are tolerable!
PRPitbull is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 05:01 PM   #19
KurtTheJetsFan
Totally Addicted
 
KurtTheJetsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hartford County, CT
Posts: 12,759
vCash: 2000
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abyzmul View Post
I have to admit that the interior of the defense does look better in past weeks, but they are still not holding the gaps well enough and Vilma has been invisible. I don't think we're in the bottom third of the league as far as run defense anymore, but it is still the weakness of our defense. When you give up certain areas of the field and the opposing coordinator bites, it is less the efficiency of your players than the efficiency of your gameplan.
D rob has improved drastically and our linebackers have become more aggressive.As a result, We are seeing an overall improvement in the run D. But we still lack size in the front 3..and Kimo is still getting knocked off the ball on many occassions. To me, this is the D's biggest weakness...and hopefully it can be addressed this offseason.

But you are right...well coached teams that recognize this..will run right at Kimo w/ a ton of success.
__________________
Section 128 J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS
KurtTheJetsFan is offline  
Old 12-03-2006, 05:09 PM   #20
Twombles
Totally Addicted
 
Twombles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,656
vCash: 1755
Default

i hate threads about trolls... thats just giving them glory. How long has it been since hes been posting here? He's been quite since the offseason i think and when there is so much to talk about he comes up lol
__________________
Twombles is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.