Reply

Can we admit we dont have an avg offense now?

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-23-2012, 05:20 AM   #281
xxedge72x
Totally Addicted
 
xxedge72x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,361
vCash: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMCJETS View Post
0 points in pre-season and NO improvements from where we left off last year. I say this offense SUCKS.
There's a reason you're not getting paid to be a GM in the NFL.

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
__________________
2004 Football Pool Champion


Thanks to Rambo13 for the awesome sig pic!
xxedge72x is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 08:19 AM   #282
Big Blocker
Totally Addicted
 
Big Blocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8,377
vCash: 500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Italian Seafood View Post
They are the starting WRs, so yes. Holmes isn't a guy you have to stand in the pocket for four seconds waiting for him to get downfield on a deep route. You can hit him with a slant and if he has a lane he's either gone or close to it. In my opinion we got away from that last year, forcing the ball to Plaxico too often.
IS,

I was specifically thinking about the run offense, upon which Rex says the Jets will depend. I don't see how Holmes being in on fourth and one would have made a difference, and that was one of the key plays in the game. Holmes might not have even been on the field that down.

OF COURSE I expect an improvement to the O when you insert Holmes and Kerley. I just don't think they will be enough to move the O up from awful to anything better than mediocre.

WHich is too bad, because I think even with an average O the team could go far.
Big Blocker is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 08:24 AM   #283
nyjunc
2008 TGG Bryan Cox "Most Argumentative" Award Winner
 
nyjunc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 40,104
vCash: 1800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WarriorRB28 View Post
I remember the O struggled during the 2002 preseason it carried over into the regular season same for 2005 the O looked like @ss during preseason. Back then I didn't think preseason mattered.

I feel differently now we'll see if the 2012 Jets buck the trend.
The O struggled in 2002 preseason? it was great which was one of the reasons why we had such high expectations.
__________________
nyjunc is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 09:03 AM   #284
al_toon_88
Totally Addicted
 
al_toon_88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 2,806
vCash: 2000
Default

Remember when there was talk of Dirk Koetter replacing Schotty?

Well, it's only preseason, but the Falcons offense is looking unstoppable, and Matty Ryan is looking better than ever.
al_toon_88 is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 09:20 AM   #285
nyjunc
2008 TGG Bryan Cox "Most Argumentative" Award Winner
 
nyjunc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 40,104
vCash: 1800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by al_toon_88 View Post
Remember when there was talk of Dirk Koetter replacing Schotty?

Well, it's only preseason, but the Falcons offense is looking unstoppable, and Matty Ryan is looking better than ever.
Their O will be excellent in the reg season as it always is. That's an O that was SHUT OUT in the WC rd last year, an O under Ryan which has never won a playoff game. Gwet back to me in January abou their offense.
__________________
nyjunc is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 09:29 AM   #286
Italian Seafood
Totally Addicted
 
Italian Seafood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Where the grass is green and the girls are pretty...
Posts: 12,545
vCash: 2000
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Blocker View Post
IS,

I was specifically thinking about the run offense, upon which Rex says the Jets will depend. I don't see how Holmes being in on fourth and one would have made a difference, and that was one of the key plays in the game. Holmes might not have even been on the field that down.

OF COURSE I expect an improvement to the O when you insert Holmes and Kerley. I just don't think they will be enough to move the O up from awful to anything better than mediocre.

WHich is too bad, because I think even with an average O the team could go far.
You're right about short yardage, but in a normal offense if you have Holmes out there the D has to respect the pass more which should help the running game. I can't go by pre-season anyway, they're not calling anything specific to the game or opponent, just running generic plays. The O-line needs to execute better in the passing and running game, that's the key to it all.
Italian Seafood is offline  
Old 08-23-2012, 09:31 AM   #287
Italian Seafood
Totally Addicted
 
Italian Seafood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Where the grass is green and the girls are pretty...
Posts: 12,545
vCash: 2000
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nyjunc View Post
Their O will be excellent in the reg season as it always is. That's an O that was SHUT OUT in the WC rd last year, an O under Ryan which has never won a playoff game. Gwet back to me in January abou their offense.
I love how last year all the pundits were saying how a playoff win would validate Ryan's greatness in the league but continue to shit on Sanchez, who has been in the league one less year and has led the Jets to four road playoff wins.
Italian Seafood is offline  
Old 08-24-2012, 11:31 AM   #288
jerseyjay14
Totally Addicted
 
jerseyjay14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,570
vCash: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Italian Seafood View Post
You're right about short yardage, but in a normal offense if you have Holmes out there the D has to respect the pass more which should help the running game. I can't go by pre-season anyway, they're not calling anything specific to the game or opponent, just running generic plays. The O-line needs to execute better in the passing and running game, that's the key to it all.
i dont think it works that way.... just like having stephen hill on the field doesnt "make defenses respect the deep ball".

sure, if holmes is on the field. we are more dangerous. but i dont think he really changes how teams are going to play us. they arent going nickel because holmes is on the field. they arent going 3 deep cause holmes is on the field. they arent going to rush just 3 guys cause holmes is on the field.

we cant protect the qb. thats an issue. and because of it teams wont respect us passing the ball. regardless of who lines up out wide
jerseyjay14 is offline  
Old 08-24-2012, 11:40 AM   #289
ouchy
Totally Addicted
 
ouchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,302
vCash: 2000
Default

I think it’s going to get ugly on offense – especially against good defenses. Mostly because we don’t have an actual ground and pound or a relevant passing attack.

But we do have:

Quarterback runs like a chicken with his head cut off and pound.

Strangely enough with our D that could win us a few games.
ouchy is offline  
Old 08-24-2012, 11:47 AM   #290
LongTimeJetsFan
Wielding A Kitchen Chair
 
LongTimeJetsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 6,969
vCash: 25
Default

It's nice to get guys the QB has chemistry with back.
New York Jets ‏@nyjets
#JH Sanchez with a nice 5-yd TD pass to Jeremy Kerley. Kerley hopes to return to action this Sunday after missing first two preseason games.

If the offense looks like shit this Sunday I'll be really worried. They should be able to move the rock w/Holmes & Kerley back and EZ pass not starting. The Panthers D isn't very good either.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benjamin Franklin
Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
LongTimeJetsFan is online now  
Old 08-24-2012, 12:38 PM   #291
Barcs
Totally Addicted
 
Barcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,978
vCash: 53
Default

Holmes most definitely changes how teams play us. A deep threat to compliment him does a lot for us. Obviously we can't get the deep ball going if the line can't protect, but saying teams won't game plan for a play maker of Holmes' caliber is absolutely silly.
__________________
Barcs is offline  
Old 08-24-2012, 01:12 PM   #292
jerseyjay14
Totally Addicted
 
jerseyjay14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,570
vCash: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barcs View Post
Holmes most definitely changes how teams play us. A deep threat to compliment him does a lot for us. Obviously we can't get the deep ball going if the line can't protect, but saying teams won't game plan for a play maker of Holmes' caliber is absolutely silly.

it wont make a difference in how teams play us. not a chance. yes, teams will be aware whenever he is on the field. but again, your not gonna go to a nickel or sub package because you are scared of holmes. your not going 3 deep because of hill or holmes. your not dropping 8 into coverage because of holmes.

we need alot more talent on the field and alot more playmakers to make teams respect our passing attack. right now, they know they can pressure us, and they know we dont really have alot of guys that are going to blow the game open with explosive plays.

im not saying teams are going to blitz 8 guys and leave holmes 1 on 1 with no help for 45 snaps. but at the same time, holmes isnt changing anything they do defensively.
jerseyjay14 is offline  
Old 08-24-2012, 01:25 PM   #293
Barcs
Totally Addicted
 
Barcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,978
vCash: 53
Default

Holmes and Hill together, will, provided Hill can develop and contribute at some point this season. You have to respect the deep threat. We didn't have one last year so teams double and tripled Holmes every game or stacked the box on us so we struggled to run it as well. Do teams game plan for Larry Fitzgerald? I guess not.
__________________
Barcs is offline  
Old 08-25-2012, 06:41 AM   #294
ScottFrost
Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 125
vCash: 500
Default

This offense is not good...Kerley, Turner, Conner, a bad O line & no running backs behind Greene is very shaky...Take the under...
ScottFrost is offline  
Old 08-25-2012, 10:02 AM   #295
jerseyjay14
Totally Addicted
 
jerseyjay14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,570
vCash: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barcs View Post
Holmes and Hill together, will, provided Hill can develop and contribute at some point this season. You have to respect the deep threat. We didn't have one last year so teams double and tripled Holmes every game or stacked the box on us so we struggled to run it as well. Do teams game plan for Larry Fitzgerald? I guess not.

santonio holmes is not larry fitzgerald

even so, with arizona having line issues of their own and no other skill players of note, it isnt difficult for teams to stack the box and still account for fitz.
jerseyjay14 is offline  
Old 08-25-2012, 11:04 AM   #296
yahoo
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 551
vCash: 500
Default

There is not one player on the offense who strikes fear into an opponents' defense.

Holmes is past his prime. Hill is still a dream. Greene needs a great offensive line. Sanchez is, well, Sanchez.
yahoo is offline  
Old 08-25-2012, 11:15 AM   #297
BadThingsMan
Undrafted FA
 
BadThingsMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 22
vCash: 100
Default

Like any fanbase, some of you need to step off the ledge, others need to stop drinking the Kool-Aid, and kudos to everyone else that has been levelheaded. It's the preseason and you guys have some injuries that accounts for your offensive struggles.

Do you have things to worry about such as your RT? Of course, but every team has issues to worry about. Buffalo's linebacker play has been underwhelming and Aaron Williams has been terrible as our second cornerback. Not putting up preseason points is not of major concern to me and I don't think it should be for any team.

Russell Wilson led the Seahawks on six straight scoring drives last night, but I'd be willing to risk a large sum of money that he doesn't do that at all in the regular season.

The Jets and Bills will each be fine in week one. They will have a lot of wrinkles both on offense and defense and I think it'll be a close game. Ryan has been excellent game planning against the Bills so there's that too. After the Bills-Jets game last year, every team followed the Jets blueprint of challenging Fitz to beat them deep.
BadThingsMan is offline  
Old 08-25-2012, 11:24 AM   #298
Br4dw4y5ux
2009 Green Guy "Most Knowledgeable" Award
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 19,608
vCash: 2000
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BadThingsMan View Post
The Jets and Bills will each be fine in week one. They will have a lot of wrinkles both on offense and defense and I think it'll be a close game. Ryan has been excellent game planning against the Bills so there's that too. After the Bills-Jets game last year, every team followed the Jets blueprint of challenging Fitz to beat them deep.
This is mainly what concerns most Jets fans. The Bills have been a pretty bad team over the last decade. I agree with you that the Bills are going to come into MetLife Stadium and make a very competitive game for the Jets.

I suspect that we'll realize at some point during that game that the Bills have at least caught up to the Jets in the AFC East. That's not good news for Jets fans at this point.

The Bills are now the team that is spending big money to put new pieces on the field around their somewhat suspect draft picks of recent years. That used to be the Jets role in AFC East power politics.
Br4dw4y5ux is offline  
Old 08-25-2012, 12:13 PM   #299
BadThingsMan
Undrafted FA
 
BadThingsMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 22
vCash: 100
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Br4dw4y5ux View Post
This is mainly what concerns most Jets fans. The Bills have been a pretty bad team over the last decade. I agree with you that the Bills are going to come into MetLife Stadium and make a very competitive game for the Jets.

I suspect that we'll realize at some point during that game that the Bills have at least caught up to the Jets in the AFC East. That's not good news for Jets fans at this point.

The Bills are now the team that is spending big money to put new pieces on the field around their somewhat suspect draft picks of recent years. That used to be the Jets role in AFC East power politics.
That is a fair concern, but eventually every team makes their way back to relevance. The Bills have been terrible for far too long and part of it was that their drafts were pretty much train wrecks and they didn't keep their own guys.

Finally the Bills appear (it's far too early to guarantee this) to be drafting well with Dareus, Williams, Sheppard, Gilmore, and Glenn are all starting for the Bills with quite a few mid-round contributors.

While I suspect it'll be a close game, the Jets could win in a blowout. That said, it doesn't necessarily mean one team is superior to the other. Every team has those "What the hell?" moments once or twice a season.

Are the Bills getting closer to the Jets and Patriots? On paper the answer is yes, but the games still need to be played.
BadThingsMan is offline  
Old 08-26-2012, 12:23 PM   #300
displacedfan
Totally Addicted
 
displacedfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 6,519
vCash: 1182
Default

Merril Hoge said Jets are looking to get 5 wins and average 10 points a game with their offense. And that the defense has not been fixed stopping the run and letting teams into the endzone.

Ok Merill. Wish "Experts" on Sportscenter could be held accountable for what they say
displacedfan is offline  
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.