Champ thinks Jets should play Tebow

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-20-2012, 07:30 PM   #41
Jetsetter34
TheGangGreen.com Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 258
vCash: 500
Default

If he gets stuck with the Jets for too long, I think he's toast. I think there are 3 teams right now that he could succeed with. The Patriots, the 49ers, or the Redskins. Shanny likes his west coast qb's, but I think he could work with Tebow.

Imagine RG3 and Tebow both in empty backfield, with 4 receivers wide, with a direct snap to either of them. It'd be friggin unstoppable. As long as they had an all-pro center, of course :-)[/QUOTE]

Umm pray tell.. why exactly would any of those teams even want Tebow?

Smith has won 20-26 games / Kaepernick proved he is already light years ahead of Tebow at the QB position. Brady isnt going anywhere and isnt going to share a freaking minute with tebow on the field and RG3 isn't going anywhere.

You guys crack me up. You know maybe the Saints will get Tebow so he and brees can be on the field.
Jetsetter34 is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 07:44 PM   #42
Bannon
Totally Addicted
 
Bannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,690
vCash: 732
Default

To hear you talk, you'd think none of those teams had backup quarterbacks.
Bannon is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 07:46 PM   #43
Jetsetter34
TheGangGreen.com Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 258
vCash: 500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bannon View Post
To hear you talk, you'd think none of those teams had backup quarterbacks.
They already have them. Who does Tebow replace? Mallet? Not a chance, Kaepernick --- yeah thats going to happen. I dont even know who the f is the back-up in Washington but he's better than Tebow.
Jetsetter34 is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 07:47 PM   #44
Bannon
Totally Addicted
 
Bannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,690
vCash: 732
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetsetter34 View Post
They already have them. Who does Tebow replace? Mallet? Not a chance, Kaepernick --- yeah thats going to happen. I dont even know who the f is the back-up in Washington but he's better than Tebow.
That explains why you mentioned their starters the first time.
Bannon is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 07:52 PM   #45
Jetsetter34
TheGangGreen.com Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 258
vCash: 500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bannon View Post
That explains why you mentioned their starters the first time.
Yes, I did because you fools believe he will not be just a back-up but will play alongside these guys in "special" packages. Tebow, according to you guys, must get in the game to show how valuable he is.

Otherwise he is just wasting away all that greatness.
Jetsetter34 is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 09:49 PM   #46
Awesomo 3000
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 90
vCash: 500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetsetter34 View Post
Umm pray tell.. why exactly would any of those teams even want Tebow?

Smith has won 20-26 games / Kaepernick proved he is already light years ahead of Tebow at the QB position. Brady isnt going anywhere and isnt going to share a freaking minute with tebow on the field and RG3 isn't going anywhere.

You guys crack me up. You know maybe the Saints will get Tebow so he and brees can be on the field.
You're clearly not worth talking to, but I'll bite anyway.

Those are coaches that have shown the ability to utilize quarterback talent better than most.

With the Patriots, Tebow could sit for a few years, and when Brady retires, you could bet they'd be able to do something with Tebow if they wanted.

Harbaugh has gotten the most out of Smith so far, and he already showed that he's better at doing trick plays than the jets. With Tebow, he could either have a backup, or at worst, he'd be better at using Tebow for gimmicks than Sparano.

If the Redskins had him, he'd be a great backup for an offense that needs a mobile quarterback. If they really got crazy, they could go with a true dual qb system, which would be pretty crazy to see, and won't happen, but the option would be there. Shanahan has a history of squeezing the most out of his quarterbacks.

So there. That's why I mentioned those three teams. Feel free to fling around some more baseless insults while contributing nothing to the discussion here. You're almost as bad as fatal.

Last edited by Awesomo 3000; 11-20-2012 at 09:51 PM.
Awesomo 3000 is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 09:56 PM   #47
Awesomo 3000
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 90
vCash: 500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetsetter34 View Post
Yes, I did because you fools believe he will not be just a back-up but will play alongside these guys in "special" packages. Tebow, according to you guys, must get in the game to show how valuable he is.

Otherwise he is just wasting away all that greatness.
Thank you. You finally found a way to read my mind. How did you know that I wanted him to play along side Brady?! And of course he would go to Washington to start ahead of RG3. Duh...!

I hadn't actually thought of it, but I'm glad you mentioned New Orleans. They oughta run Brees out of town so that Tebow can go and start for them.

It's like you read my mind...

Aren't you special?

By the way... are there any other thoughts I've had, which I wasn't aware of? You seem to be waaay ahead of the curve in telling me what I'm about to start thinking about thinking. Please help me, so I know what content to put in my next post. I'm so lost without you.
Awesomo 3000 is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 01:12 PM   #48
BroncosFan1345
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 33
vCash: 500
Default

Tebow won't solve much.

Jets have zero playmakers, defense is OK, but not as good in past years. Don't know why some people think he'll solve everything.
BroncosFan1345 is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.