|
|
#61 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 142
vCash: 500 |
All this big talk all summer about Mark Sanchez being the guy and how it was Wayne Hunter's fault, Shotty, Rex, Tannebuam, Santonio Holmes, the Milk Man ... after two games, already its time to talk about who's next? Really? Hey man, if Sanchez is this supposed stud, you got to ride it out for the season now; you're stuck with him. He got his extension. Jets brought in Tebow and made him a Punt Protector. Sanchez is the guy. Time to take your medicine like a man, strap a pair on, and let the kid sink or swim. Time to take off the diapers.
|
|
|
| Wolf Brother |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Wolf Brother |
|
|
#62 | |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,053
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
| 101_GANG_GREEN_101 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by 101_GANG_GREEN_101 |
|
|
#63 | |
|
Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 178
vCash: 2269 |
Quote:
I for one am ready to give someone else a shot and would prefer that someone be McElroy, since we have him in-house. I watched him play his entire time at Alabama and honestly believe he can win with the Jets. Noodle arm, only able to manage the game, just handed off at Alabama, talks too much for a rookie, whatever other reason people on here have for hating the thought of him running our team. GIVE HIM A CHANCE and then say "I told you so" if he's a complete flop. At least then you will have a legitimate reason for disliking him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
TheGangGreen.com Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 710
vCash: 2000 |
Quote:
__________________
Just Enjoy The Season |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 4,356
vCash: 2000 |
Sanchez just does not make enough plays for me. I see this as a make or break year for him. If nothing else, the Jets should draft a QB to groom for the future while they patiently wait for Sanchez to become more than just mediocre.
|
|
|
| sackexchange |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by sackexchange |
|
|
#66 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,059
vCash: 50 |
No more USC QB's!
Tyler Bray gives up to easy.
__________________
So long sanchez, Hello Geno. |
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8,377
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
The first is if Sanchez can't play due to injury. Now this is one of my main objections to the whole Tebow thing. The concern was how would working Tebow in at the same time a new OC is here, putting in a new O (of course how much of THAT has gone on is a whole different subject), AND prepping the backup Qb. Well who really is the backup Qb here if Sanchez got hurt? I have yet to see anything to suggest Tebow would work as the starter with a passing attack and the players the Jets have. We know his ceiling in that kind of role. We don't know McElroy's. The problem, though, is I doubt there has been much effort working with McElroy to prepare him to step in and run the O. Can anyone say Brooks Bollinger and remember how Chadwick and Fiedler went down in the same game? The second, which is hardly worth mentioning here, is if at some point well down the road here in the season it looks like Sanchez is not going to stick here, better imo to see what McElroy can do than waste time on Tebow. But for the second, like I said, way too early, and hopefully Sanchez stays healthy and gets it done. |
|
|
|
| Big Blocker |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Big Blocker |
|
|
#68 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,384
vCash: 500 |
I agree with everything you said. But considering how things are now Tebow will be starting.
|
|
|
| The 1985er |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by The 1985er |
|
|
#69 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,314
vCash: 2000 |
At this point it is Mc Elroy or the draft.
|
|
|
| FOURTHANDLONG |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by FOURTHANDLONG |
|
|
#70 | |
|
Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 178
vCash: 2269 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 178
vCash: 2269 |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8,377
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
But I agree the "logic" of all the publicity that went along with the Tebow trade makes it unlikely they would have hte balls to keep Tebow on the bench and see what they have with McElroy. Hey this is no prediciton taht McElroy is a sure thing. Not at all. But we know Tebow will not be the answer. |
|
|
|
| Big Blocker |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Big Blocker |
|
|
#73 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,975
vCash: 53 |
"how things are now". Interesting. 1-1 in a 4 way tie in the AFC East. Sanchez had a great game and a weak game. That warrants Tim Tebow to the rescue? I think Sanchez will handle business in Miami provided he doesn't get rattled in the head again. That was brutal. As soon as I saw it, I was like, "I don't care about the 15 yards, I don't like that hit at all". I'm surprised he didn't get a concussion from that. Game over. I still trust in Sanchez. We all need to send him positive vibes. Quit holding the man back! We also need Revis!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 8,377
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
I think "how things are now" is too ambiguous, and you point out one way to read it. But thought he meant in terms of if Sanchez is not out there for whatever reason, "how thiings are now" means the politics and optics of everything would mean Tebow would start over McElroy. Which imo is the opposite of what should happen. But that is too theoretical to warrant much discussion at this point, imo. At this point Sanchez is the starter and should remain so for the foreseeable future. If "how things are now" means Sanchez can play, he should play, end of story. In fact I would shitcan the wildcat plays pretty much. |
|
|
|
| Big Blocker |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Big Blocker |
|
|
#75 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,401
vCash: 500 |
Sanchez was 4/5 60 yards 2 TDs the plays following the wildcat in week one.
The wildcat was 3 plays for 27 yards (net) in week 2 when the rest of the offense passing was 6 of 22 for 58 yards through quarters 2-4 there is no "logical" reason to stop using it other than your personal bias against Tebow . However Rex and the gang do not really have any plans for it anyway (read below) Quote:
Say he sucks throwing the ball and the offense turns into ugly ball and also go ahead and say he is not an NFL QB all you want but don't pretend your going 0-10 with him because that is just stupid and has no basis in reality whatsoever. I also do not agree that Tebow would be the starter instead of Mcelroy, Rex , Sporano and Tanny DO NOT want tebow at QB, Tebow was woody's idea (a good idea but just Woody's). That is evident by the way he was used last week. Rex and Tanny and Sporano have no ideas about ever letting Tebow play more than a few snaps in order to appease Woody, that is obvious after the passing game went 6-22 for 58 yards for 3 quarters and the "tebow-circus cat" went 3 plays for 27 yards and then was yanked for the rest of the game (obviously a bone head decision based on not wanting Tebow in the game). Rex might as well start wearing a ghostbusters style shirt with the red circle and the x across Tebow's face during the post game conferences. So don't worry about Tebow anymore he is a non factor on this team by design (Jet's loss because he could have been very effective in the change of pace role). If Sanchez tanks (and I personally do not think he will) get ready for the Mcelroy era because even if Tebow is next up he won't really have the organization behind him (Denver 2.0 ). Last edited by CowboysFan; 09-18-2012 at 12:04 PM. |
|
|
|
| CowboysFan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by CowboysFan |
|
|
#76 | |
|
TheGangGreen.com Fanatic
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 622
vCash: 2000 |
Quote:
The Jets are still trying to figure out the best way to use Tebow. Its going to take some time. Right now that really represents a lot of things on this roster. How much time does Tebow get? What about Mcintyre and Powell, how much more time do they get? Should Ducasse play more snaps? This team is in some flux but that doesn't mean that these types of questions won't get answered. Can we all at least enjoy one big positive, the Pats Lost Look at the Pats next five games at Baltimore at Buffalo home vs. Denver at Seattle home vs. Jets without Hernandez, they could be in some big trouble. That loss to the Cardinals was huge because I could definitely see 2 more losses in the next 5 weeks. |
|
|
|
| MyFavoriteMartin5 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by MyFavoriteMartin5 |
|
|
#77 | |
|
TheGangGreen.com Fanatic
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North by Northeast
Posts: 628
vCash: 25 |
Quote:
__________________
You don't have to believe everything you think. Sporting Pink, just to annoy some of ya. |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,401
vCash: 500 |
I am not in disagreement with you at all my post was in reference to Tebow and Mcelroy and Big Blocker saying he wont'watch games if Tebow is in the game over him.
Last edited by CowboysFan; 09-18-2012 at 01:27 PM. |
|
|
| CowboysFan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by CowboysFan |
|
|
#79 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Revis Island and Never Leaving
Posts: 2,185
vCash: 500 |
I guys some of you idiots cant read smfh
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,196
vCash: 2000 |
As I understand Sanchez's contract, despite the fact that I think this year is his make or break season, he will be the starter in 2013. Just because of the guarenteed money for 2013 and there is no cost savings in cutting him. If he doesn't break out this year though I expect the Jets to draft a QB early in the next draft and work him in during the 2013 season.
|
|
|
| 1968jetsfan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by 1968jetsfan |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|