|
|
#21 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Glen Cove, NY
Posts: 5,809
vCash: 2000 |
My problem with Upshaw, and I think what they're trying to reiterate, is that you can't put a guy with those kinds of physical question marks in the top 20. If you do, you're really gambling with your job as a general manager.
If you take Upshaw with Nick Perry on the board, and Nick Perry goes on to have a far superior career, you have egg on your face. I think Upshaw is going to be a durable, solid starter in this league, but I'm not going to bank my pass rush on him. At 17, you have to take a guy with more athletic upside, particularly when you have an athletically challenged linebacker group, like the Jets do. -X- |
|
|
| xjets2002x |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by xjets2002x |
|
|
#22 | |
|
2009 Green Guy "Most Knowledgeable" Award
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 19,595
vCash: 2000 |
Quote:
To give you an idea: Courtney Upshaw 6'2", 273 lbs, 4.8 40 Calvin Pace 6'4", 269 lbs, 4.75 40 Bryan Thomas 6'5", 269 lbs, 4.55 40 The Jets played Pace on the left side and Thomas on the right side. Upshaw doesn't really fit in either slot and if they had Pace and Upshaw opposite each other they'd be missing a speed rush completely. |
|
|
|
| Br4dw4y5ux |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Br4dw4y5ux |
|
|
#23 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,164
vCash: 2100 |
I'm not an Upshaw guy. He played on a loaded D.
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: central NY
Posts: 10,423
vCash: 25 |
that is a terrible reason (by itself) to not want a guy.
|
|
|
| nyjetsrule |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by nyjetsrule |
|
|
#25 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,164
vCash: 2100 |
Not the only, just the only one not stated so far. The team he played on made him look better than he was, I watched a bunch of games and he was rarely doubled. Too many good players on that side on the ball to do it. I think both Hightower and Barron will be better pro's. He'll be OK, but not a star and we need a star.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|