|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
Wielding A Kitchen Chair
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 7,111
vCash: 25 |
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
| LongTimeJetsFan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by LongTimeJetsFan |
|
|
#2 |
|
Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 225
vCash: 500 |
Sounds good to me. We are thin at linebacker, so having one fewer of them on the field makes a lot of sense to me.
|
|
|
| TwoHeadedMonster |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by TwoHeadedMonster |
|
|
#3 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,492
vCash: 25 |
D line will be a staple for us this year
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 616
vCash: 300 |
Whatever wins.
|
|
|
| reverseapachemaster |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by reverseapachemaster |
|
|
#5 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 12,722
vCash: 1401 |
Coples-Pouha-Devito-Wilkerson (1st/2nd)
Maybin-Wilkerson-Coples-Pace (3rd downs) Scott-Harris-Davis Cro-Landry/Smith-Bell/Bush-Revis Somethin like that. This, in addition to the 3-4 and 46 looks we can run gives us a pretty versatile D. Last edited by Jake; 06-15-2012 at 01:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
TheGangGreen.com Regular
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 304
vCash: 25 |
Really excited to see what kind of havoc Wilkerson and Coples can generate this season. I cant remember the last time we had this much pass rush potential, with Maybin hopefully able to keep his weight in the 240-250 area. I like the switch to 4-3 because of our lack of linebacker depth and increased d line presence.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Wielding A Kitchen Chair
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 7,111
vCash: 25 |
That 3rd down d-line has the potential to be dominant. I'm not saying it will be, but man it sounds good on paper.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| LongTimeJetsFan |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by LongTimeJetsFan |
|
|
#8 |
|
2009 Green Guy "Most Knowledgeable" Award
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 19,793
vCash: 2000 |
3-4 without a dominant LB was what held the Jets back in the end in the last couple of seasons. 4-3 is going to be better if they're able to find a dominant end in the process. Otherwise it's going to be the same as the 3-4, strong on scheme and eventually breaking down at the end because there's no game-breaker in the front 7.
|
|
|
| Br4dw4y5ux |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Br4dw4y5ux |
|
|
#9 | |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,512
vCash: 25 |
Quote:
__________________
There are times when a girl won't fuck you, but the Jets will ALWAYS fuck you!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
2009 Green Guy "Most Knowledgeable" Award
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 19,793
vCash: 2000 |
Spark, shmark. Somebody on that side of the ball is going to have to step it up and get double digits sacks for next year to be any different than last year or 2010. Either that or the Jets are going to have to go back to being blitzing maniacs again coming from on all angles on most passing plays.
|
|
|
| Br4dw4y5ux |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Br4dw4y5ux |
|
|
#11 | |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,512
vCash: 25 |
Quote:
__________________
There are times when a girl won't fuck you, but the Jets will ALWAYS fuck you!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 225
vCash: 500 |
You think Pace will be better as a 4-3 end than as an OLB?
|
|
|
| TwoHeadedMonster |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by TwoHeadedMonster |
|
|
#13 | |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 12,722
vCash: 1401 |
Quote:
We have a bunch of guys on this D that can play multiple positions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,803
vCash: 685 |
Im expecting a very good defense next season. If we can finally get a pass rush, this D will be great.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
TheGangGreen.com Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 858
vCash: 500 |
I think our defense is prepped for a monster season. Our offense just needs to be steady and productive, a la 2009 and 2010, and we should be a playoff team.
|
|
|
| Will-I-Am-Not |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Will-I-Am-Not |
|
|
#16 |
|
TheGangGreen.com Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 578
vCash: 750 |
I may be wrong, or may have misunderstood the article in the way I view it but when I first read this I can't help but have thought this is an attempt to counter the no huddle that NE likes to utilize so much.
By simplifying the defense, it's easier for the on the field players to adapt without the huddle. I'm also kind of skeptical, wasn't one of the strengths that no one knew what we were doing? I remember Brady saying in an interview during the playoff game, that he had no idea what to expect, because we were so complex and hid everything so well, he was almost paranoid because he couldn't get a finger on what was going on. This led to anxiety, and so forth. We've prided ourselves on complex blitzing schemes, I'm not sure simplfying everything is the right route to go, our weakness on defense wasn't due to over-complexity, it was due to lack of speed and talent in either our safeties (*ahem*, Eric Smith) or linebackers to block against the run on the outside. If we were talking about the offensive side of the ball -- I'd be glad to hear that, because everyone knew Schotty was overly complex, but I never once got the feeling that the defense was over it's head in trying to understand the plays. Last edited by PraisebetoRevis; 06-15-2012 at 06:03 PM. |
|
|
| PraisebetoRevis |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by PraisebetoRevis |
|
|
#17 | |
|
2009 Green Guy "Most Knowledgeable" Award
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 19,793
vCash: 2000 |
Quote:
It's getting caught with Pouha, Devito and Scott on the field when Brady suddenly decides to spread it wide that is deadly. It's having Maybin and 5 or 6 DB's on the field when Brady decides to go strong. It's the fact that once the no-huddle is running Brady gets to do whatever is most effective against the Jets front. Putting 7 guys on the field that prevent Brady from beating the personnel by a simple scheme adjustment is the best defense against the no-huddle. |
|
|
|
| Br4dw4y5ux |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Br4dw4y5ux |
|
|
#18 | |
|
Starter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 225
vCash: 500 |
Quote:
i.e. If they take their first step a second earlier, it doesn't matter that the steps are a second slower than they should be? Will that work? Who knows. Every team has to mask weakness at some position or another. I say it doesn't matter if our D plays a second faster if the simpler D means the opposing QB can make his decision a second quicker. |
|
|
|
| TwoHeadedMonster |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by TwoHeadedMonster |
|
|
#19 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chester, UK
Posts: 2,196
vCash: 2000 |
So the Jets are playing the 'Just For Men' defense?
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Totally Addicted
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,468
vCash: 25 |
G-girls used a good 4-man front to beat the Pats in the SB twice in a row....can't be all bad if you got the men to pull it off.
__________________
I went on a 30 day diet and so far I've lost 17 days |
|
|
| Footballgod214 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Footballgod214 |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|