Since they are playing today, why are the chiefs considered such a better franchise. They are at 49 years this year, I don’t see them winning it this year with their defense. Only been to 3 conference championship games with the last being in 1993. Playoff record of 9-18. Jets playoff record is 12-13, so two less games. But ha e been in 5 conference championships. Lost 4 of those is the problem. 5 TOS in 82, 6 in 98, 1 each in the last two. 98 was the real killer.
I'm sure if u live in KC or near the KC area they are bemoaning the KCCs just like we bemoan the NYJs
Guess what day it is........ Guess what day it is........ YEARS AGO (and I'm talking years ago) I used to put up SB III threads religiously. All of the images were hosted on imageshack.us, which is complete garbage now and they wiped everyone's photos if you didn't sign up for the paid service. So, I lost it all. I never had the energy to re-host everything somewhere else. Currently using shitbucket (photobucket) which will start watermarking everything on January 19th if you don't switch to paid. Pretty soon Jamal Adams and his creeper are gonna have PHOTOBUCKET across their faces. Does anyone know of a decent image hosting site that's free? I heard imugr or whatever it's called is kinda on the weird/invasive side (?) Thanks.
Atleast some of you older fellas were around for the SB. I'm 41 and have resigned to the fact I may never see one.
My Inlaws are all from Western Mizzou and are rabid Chief fans and yeah, they're not exactly bragging about their past, but they are absolutely giddy about Mahomes and their future. Too bad their D sucks though..
2018 Jets think season ends Week 1 Alternatively if Darnold doesn't pan out 2018 Rookie QB plays like rookie 2019 2nd year QB plays like rookie 2020 3rd year QB plays like rookie Etc. (Wow I am a darksider.)
Thanks for the memory! EDIT: BTW - This ought to be required viewing for any Jets fan who never saw the game.
That looks more like Joe Namath in 1972. His hair was shorter in 1969. People who make those action figures don't know what the hell they're doing!
And as you can see some of his neck is showing in the photo. There is no neck showing on the figure. You just proved me correct. Namath's hair was SHORTING in 1969 than the figure represents.
'Creepy Joe Namath Doll'. I give you . . . OK, I've been outdone, because I have no clue what the fck this is. I guess they got the hairy pube arms and the knees right, but it has a vagina.