actually i read it in another Geno thread on this site lmao. It wasn't a post though it was a link. i'll see if i can find it.
Your points could be accepted but when U added "Can't baby him anymore" you lost credibility. This is exactly what we done with Geno and he has two very sub par years.
Bad post. Nowhere did it say we should continue to baby Geno either. Good effort trying to twist the post around though.
I think your friend was probably snickering/laughing when he was telling you that. There isn't a fan or team that would take a swap of Geno with their current QB. That is a fact. Once again I'll say it if you have talent you can succeed in any system. The WCO offense is the most QB friendly offense ever created and Geno struggled mightily. On top of that I think they dumbed it down even further just for Geno. He can't read defenses, he bird dogs the primary receiver and his passes are either high, low or off target all together. So we will see early on if he picks up Gailey offense whatever that is.
Sorry U feel that way but U implied we shouldn't being babying Millner. I just pushed what u say about 1 player but not the other. If Geno was not mentioned by U than I would be guilty. And I consider it a good post in response to the Geno hate portion. It was a twist with purpose.
No but I'll entertain it as if that's what I said.. looking at that way Milliner was "babied" because he was our #1 simply because everyone else sucked he is now #4 because there are 3 better than him allowing us to treat him different. Geno has been #1 because everyone else sucked and he is still #1 because everyone else still sucks so while we shouldn't have and shouldn't now "baby" him you can see why it may still be happening. So even looking at it that way it doesn't make a difference regarding Milliners stance he's in a different situation regarding "babying."
