PDA

View Full Version : Madden '07 NYJ player ratings


WarriorRB28
08-10-2006, 03:08 PM
Shaun Ellis is the highest rated player on the team/defense.

Curtis Martin is the highest rated player on offense.

The roster is already outdated. Quitter Monsanto Pope is still on the roster.LOL

To view links in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. Your post count is 0 momentarily.

You can get the player ratings from all the teams here:

To view links in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. Your post count is 0 momentarily.

LockDown24
08-10-2006, 03:11 PM
Pennington has an injury rating of 45 yet Daunte Culpeppers is 87... wtf?

EcKo151
08-10-2006, 03:13 PM
David Barrett 87 overall??

I like that Miller went up in speed(92 to 95) Change Dyson's number to 21. JMac dropped to 80, accurate.

No gripes except MAYBE Rhodes getting a 78 overall, but pretty good.

PennyandtheJets
08-10-2006, 03:17 PM
I am still sad I won't be playing much of Madden 07...I am going away to college for the first time this semester and I am dedicating almost all of my time to school work and my social life.

I will probably play it after I establish myself at college in the spring.

Scikotic
08-10-2006, 03:18 PM
IMO Cotch is too low at 75, Rhodes at 78 should be bumped to about 83...penny is about right granted he hasnt accomplished much on the IR lately...Martin is too high...Vilma should be slightly above Ellis, and Dyson should be slightly higger...glad JMAC is down to 80...had no idea Kassell is rated so good..hes an 85...hmmmm....i havent seen mcuh of this guy so it was a surprise to me....also Teague is an 85...surprised me as well...

looks like the jets...

Scikotic
08-10-2006, 03:19 PM
I am still sad I won't be playing much of Madden 07...I am going away to college for the first time this semester and I am dedicating almost all of my time to school work and my social life.

I will probably play it after I establish myself at college in the spring.


did you just graduate High School? also what college are you going to?

Mr.ThirdDown
08-10-2006, 03:19 PM
David Barret gets an 87? Does he know someone at EA Sports or something? Had to laugh at Jolley's 80 too.

phubbadaman
08-10-2006, 03:23 PM
Some were high, some were low. I thought for the most part pretty high.

ColezDeep!
08-10-2006, 03:30 PM
Lol...Bush's stats are off the chart

hazmat
08-10-2006, 04:16 PM
How the heck does Sean Ellis get such a high grade? He was so bad last year.

CmartinHOF
08-10-2006, 05:10 PM
are these even real???? because i see jonathen vilma having a better rating then 92 imo

PennyandtheJets
08-10-2006, 07:33 PM
did you just graduate High School? also what college are you going to?
No I went to a community college for a few years...

I am going to school in Salisbury, Maryland at the University of Salisbury.

It will be my first year away from home so it will be a pretty big transition year in my life so I figure video games can go on hold for a little bit.

NY Vilmaniac
08-10-2006, 08:15 PM
i hate that they made dysonan 84

wasnt he a 90 last year???

The Predator
08-10-2006, 08:32 PM
IMO Cotch is too low at 75, Rhodes at 78 should be bumped to about 83..

Why should Cotch be any higher? What has he ever done in the NFL? He has like 15 catches in two years. Believe me, I think he is and will be a good player, but he has done nothing to deserve anythign higher than a 75.

And Rhodes doesn't deserve a bump either, he is only in his second year, didn't have a spectacular rookie season (although he did play well and better than expected), and he has no real reason to be any higher.

The player that really jumps out at me who should've been rated higher is Ben Graham. The guy was nothing short of excellent for us and he gets snubbed with an 82


PennyandtheJets, trust me, your going into college thinking you will pesnd all your time studying, socializing, and working, but that wont last long. You'll be up playing video games well into the wee hours of the morning in no time.

inSANITy
08-10-2006, 09:30 PM
2 things 1 vilma with 69 strength wtf

2 this has nothing to do with the jets but chris cooley a 98 give me a break he is good but not that good

jetsaholic1094
08-10-2006, 09:54 PM
Some were high, some were low. I thought for the most part pretty high.

To view links in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. Your post count is 0 momentarily.

EcKo151
08-10-2006, 10:24 PM
i hate that they made dysonan 84

wasnt he a 90 last year???
86 he was...

I'm surprised Miller made the big jump, thought he'd be 81 or 82...

hydro51
08-11-2006, 03:37 AM
Why should Cotch be any higher? What has he ever done in the NFL? He has like 15 catches in two years. Believe me, I think he is and will be a good player, but he has done nothing to deserve anythign higher than a 75.

And Rhodes doesn't deserve a bump either, he is only in his second year, didn't have a spectacular rookie season (although he did play well and better than expected), and he has no real reason to be any higher.

The player that really jumps out at me who should've been rated higher is Ben Graham. The guy was nothing short of excellent for us and he gets snubbed with an 82


PennyandtheJets, trust me, your going into college thinking you will pesnd all your time studying, socializing, and working, but that wont last long. You'll be up playing video games well into the wee hours of the morning in no time.

rhodes is better than coleman if he can get a 83 so should rhodes imo.

highflyer
08-11-2006, 04:29 AM
Graham is rated lower than Knorr was last year dammit

Ten
08-11-2006, 05:16 AM
I don't know if this is new for the series or if they had it last year but there are much more attributes than before,including ratings for stiff arm,blocking strength,impact blocking ect

Duk Dodgers
08-11-2006, 07:05 AM
I don't know if this is new for the series or if they had it last year but there are much more attributes than before,including ratings for stiff arm,blocking strength,impact blocking ect

Oh its def'n new. And about time too. Different Corners are better in zone then man, Rb's have different styles of play.....i'm glad the expanded the ratings to include these.

lightning
08-11-2006, 12:42 PM
damn miller's good

ButtleMan
08-11-2006, 12:56 PM
Trey Teague an 86??? Who knew he would be so good.
He is also listed as a C so that means that Mangold will be the backup.

lightning
08-11-2006, 01:16 PM
Oh its def'n new. And about time too. Different Corners are better in zone then man, Rb's have different styles of play.....i'm glad the expanded the ratings to include these.
Exactly, Example: Ronde Barber would be better in zone. DeAngelo Hall would be better in man.

The Predator
08-11-2006, 05:45 PM
this has nothing to do with the jets but chris cooley a 98 give me a break he is good but not that good


WOW! Thanks for pointing that out! That is seriously screwed up. He definatly had a good season and is a very solid tight end, but he is not in the class of Gates ane Gonzalez, and Heap. He should be a 91-93.

Tight
08-11-2006, 09:11 PM
WOW! Thanks for pointing that out! That is seriously screwed up. He definatly had a good season and is a very solid tight end, but he is not in the class of Gates ane Gonzalez, and Heap. He should be a 91-93.

The reason hes rated so high because hes listed as a fb. Takeo spikes barely played last season. Why the hell is he rated so high. F*** ea

inSANITy
08-11-2006, 09:28 PM
willie parker is a 97 speed wat was he last year like 90-92

inSANITy
08-11-2006, 09:31 PM
odell thurman second year 86 ovr 84 speed 74 strength wtf vilma is def better

david garrad 70 speed?

JetFanInPA
08-11-2006, 11:41 PM
Anyone notice Eric Smith's rating?























Neither did I.... :ohmy:

MParty7441
08-12-2006, 01:11 PM
damn...a lot of new attributes, I like that

Cakes
08-12-2006, 11:17 PM
PennyandtheJets, trust me, your going into college thinking you will pesnd all your time studying, socializing, and working, but that wont last long. You'll be up playing video games well into the wee hours of the morning in no time.

This is true. Even after going to class and studying and eating and pooping and socializing and what not, eventually he'll settle in one night and want to relax with a video game for an hour or so.

Also, Cooley should be about a 92 and should be listed as an H-back.

boomer
08-13-2006, 10:17 AM
Why are these different from the other ratings? Which is the right one.

jetsfan119
08-16-2006, 10:42 AM
Wow, Mike Chatam has an 85 ovr rating, surprising

Mexican Buc
08-18-2006, 11:26 PM
Lol...Bush's stats are off the chart
HE was off the charts.


I mean I don't agree with rookies being higher then 84-85 myself. And that's the best rookies. But bush does deserve a 86-87 rating. He comes in with SO MUCH on his shoulders. I mean the "he hasn't played one real down in the NFL yet" card only wields so much power.

lightning
08-21-2006, 12:03 PM
HE was off the charts.


I mean I don't agree with rookies being higher then 84-85 myself. And that's the best rookies. But bush does deserve a 86-87 rating. He comes in with SO MUCH on his shoulders. I mean the "he hasn't played one real down in the NFL yet" card only wields so much power.
He's not gale sayers right fucking now. No way he deserves that rating.

FITM
08-21-2006, 02:49 PM
Wow, Mike Chatam has an 85 ovr rating, surprising

Where the hell do you see that?

Matt Chatham? He's a 69 overall.